تحلیل ناهمگنی فضایی توزیع خدمات شهری در کلان‌شهر تبریز با بهره‌گیری از مدل رگرسیون وزنی جغرافیایی و شاخص‌های خودهمبستگی فضایی

نوع مقاله : علمی - پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 گروه برنامه‌ریزی منطقه‌ای، پژوهشکده توسعه و برنامه‌ریزی، جهاد دانشگاهی، تبریز، ایران

2 گروه برنامه‌ریزی شهری، موسسه آموزش عالی سراج، تبریز، ایران

چکیده

توزیع فضایی خدمات شهری نقش مهمی در تحقق عدالت فضایی، ارتقای کیفیت زندگی و افزایش کارایی نظام برنامه‌ریزی شهری دارد. در کلان‌شهر تبریز، گسترش نامتوازن کالبدی، تمرکز فعالیت‌ها و رشد جمعیت موجب نابرابری مکانی در استقرار خدمات و کاهش دسترسی شهروندان شده است. پژوهش حاضر از نظر هدف کاربردی و از نظر ماهیت توصیفی–تحلیلی با رویکرد فضایی–آماری است و با هدف تحلیل الگوی پراکنش خدمات شهری و سنجش میزان انطباق آن با تراکم جمعیت در سطح نواحی شهری تبریز انجام‌شده است. داده‌های مکانی خدمات و جمعیت با بهره‌گیری از مدل‌های تراکم کرنل، شاخص میانگین نزدیک‌ترین همسایگی (ANN)، شاخص خودهمبستگی فضایی موران جهانی و مدل رگرسیون وزنی جغرافیایی (GWR) در محیط GIS تحلیل شدند. نتایج نشان می‌دهد که اغلب خدمات شهری دارای الگوی خوشه‌ای و تمرکز بالا در هسته مرکزی شهر هستند و با فاصله گرفتن از مرکز، تراکم و تنوع خدمات کاهش می‌یابد. مقادیر ANN کمتر از یک و مقادیر مثبت و معنادار موران جهانی، وجود خودهمبستگی فضایی مثبت و تمرکز ساختاریافته خدمات را تأیید می‌کند. نتایج GWR نیز بیانگر ناهمگنی مکانی رابطه میان تراکم جمعیت و تعداد خدمات است؛ به‌گونه‌ای که شدت این رابطه در نواحی مختلف متفاوت بوده و انطباق کامل میان نیاز جمعیتی و استقرار خدمات مشاهده نمی‌شود. این وضعیت حاکی از چالش در تحقق عدالت افقی و عمودی در توزیع خدمات شهری است. بر این اساس، تقویت قطب‌های خدماتی پیرامونی و بازنگری در سیاست‌های مکان‌یابی خدمات برای کاهش نابرابری فضایی ضروری است.

کلیدواژه‌ها


عنوان مقاله [English]

Spatial Heterogeneity Analysis of Urban Service Distribution in Tabriz Metropolis Using Geographically Weighted Regression and Spatial Autocorrelation Indices

نویسندگان [English]

  • Mohammad Shali 1
  • Hessam Esmaeili Qezeljeh Meydan 2
1 Department of Regional Planning, Development and Planning Research Institute, Iranian Academic Center for Education, Culture and Research (ACECR), Tabriz, Iran
2 Department of Urban planning, Seraj Higher Education Institute, Tabriz, Iran
چکیده [English]

A B S T R A C T
The spatial distribution of urban services plays an essential role in achieving spatial justice, improving quality of life, and enhancing the efficiency of the urban planning system. Unbalanced physical expansion, concentration of activities, and population growth in the metropolis of Tabriz have led to spatial inequality in the allocation of services and reduced accessibility for residents. This study is applied in terms of objective and descriptive–analytical in nature, employing a spatial–statistical approach to analyze the spatial pattern of urban services and assess its compatibility with population density across the urban districts of Tabriz. Spatial data on services and population were analyzed in a GIS environment using Kernel Density estimation, the Average Nearest Neighbor (ANN) index, Global Moran’s I spatial autocorrelation index, and the Geographically Weighted Regression (GWR) model. The results indicate that most urban services follow a clustered pattern with high concentration in the central core of the city, whereas both the density and diversity of services decrease with increasing distance from the center. ANN values below one and positive, statistically significant Moran’s I values confirm the presence of positive spatial autocorrelation and a structured concentration of services. Results of the GWR model further demonstrate spatial heterogeneity in the relationship between population density and service abundance; the strength of this relationship varies across diverse districts, and no whole alignment between population needs and service provisions is not observed. This situation reflects challenges in attaining both horizontal and vertical equity in the distribution of urban services. Accordingly, strengthening peripheral service centers and revising service location policies are essential to reduce spatial inequality.
Extended Abstract
Introduction
The rapid pace of urbanization, the concentration of population, and economic activities in metropolitan areas have made the spatial reorganization of urban services and the systematic evaluation of their distribution patterns a central concern in urban planning. The spatial distribution of urban services not only influences infrastructure efficiency and transportation systems but is also directly linked to quality of life, equality of opportunities, and the realization of spatial justice. The concentration of services in central areas and their scarcity in peripheral zones contribute to a core–periphery pattern and the reproduction of spatial inequality. International literature indicates that such spatial mismatches result from the interplay of physical structures, demographic dynamics, land market mechanisms, and urban policy decisions, and their analysis requires advanced spatial–statistical frameworks. In recent decade, the utilization of GIS tools, density analysis, spatial autocorrelation indices, neighborhood statistics, and location-based regression models has enabled the identification of service clusters, deficit areas, and spatial heterogeneity in the relationship between population and services. In Iran, numerous studies have examined spatial justice in urban services; however, many have concentrated chiefly on per capita indicators, ranking techniques, and multi-criteria decision-making models, with limited attention to modeling spatial non-stationarity in the population–service relationship. Consequently, data-driven and GIS-based studies that analytically and explanatorily assess the actual distribution of services and their alignment with population structure remain essential. Within this framework, the present study integrates Kernel Density analysis, the Average Nearest Neighbor index, Global Moran’s I, and regression models to investigate the spatial organization of urban services in the metropolitan city of Tabriz.
 
Methodology
This study employs a quantitative, applied approach with a descriptive-analytical design and a spatial-statistical methodology. The unit of analysis consists of 38 urban districts within Tabriz city. Population data were obtained from the 2016 national census, and population density was calculated as the independent variable. Spatial data for 12 types of urban services were collected in point format and analyzed using ArcGIS 10.8.2. Kernel Density, the Average Nearest Neighbor index, and Global Moran’s I were applied to examine spatial distribution patterns. The relationship between population density and the number of services at the district level was first modeled using Ordinary Least Squares (OLS) and subsequently with Geographically Weighted Regression (GWR). In conclusion, spatial autocorrelation of model residuals was assessed to evaluate model adequacy.
 
Results and Discussion
The findings indicate that the spatial distribution of urban services in the metropolis of Tabriz is predominantly concentrated and clustered, significantly reflecting the city’s center–periphery structure. Kernel density analysis and the Average Nearest Neighbor index (ANN < 1) disclose spatial concentration of most services within the central core. Positive and statistically significant Global Moran’s I values confirm the presence of positive spatial autocorrelation and a structured clustered pattern. However, the intensity of concentration varies across service types. Commercial, cultural–artistic, and religious services illustrate the highest density within the historical core, whereas network-based and safety-related services such as metro, BRT, fire stations, and CNG stations exhibit a more dispersed distribution pattern governed by network logic. Comparison of OLS and GWR models demonstrates that, for most services, GWR provides improved model fit through higher R² values and lower AICc scores, confirming spatial non-stationarity in the relationship between population density and service distribution. The variation in Local R² and local coefficients indicates spatial heterogeneity at the district level. In the eastern zones, despite low population density, positive and significant coefficients suggest proactive service development. In contrast, northern high-density districts exhibit weak or negative coefficients for certain services, indicating a mismatch between service provision and demographic demand. In the central core, historical accumulation of services has resulted in their relative independence from the current population structure. Overall, the distribution pattern of urban services in Tabriz reflects a combination of historical concentration, network-based logic, and spatial heterogeneity in the population–service relationship.
 
Conclusion
The results of this study indicate that the urban service distribution system in Tabriz has not developed according to a balanced and needs-based pattern, rather reflects the historical accumulation of investments and development priorities within the central core. The statistically significant concentration of services in the city center and their gradual decline toward peripheral areas demonstrate the persistence of a center–periphery structure in the spatial organization of services. This concentration is merely a function of the functional attractiveness of the historical core but also a consequence of location policies driven by economic efficiency and central accessibility. Spatial non-stationarity analysis reveals that the relationship between population density and service provision is not uniform across the city. In certain high-density areas—particularly in the northern districts—the weak correlation between population and number of services indicates relative shortages and deficiencies in vertical equity. Simultaneously, noticeable differences in service levels among districts with similar population densities reflect shortcomings in horizontal equity. Conversely, proactive service development in eastern areas illustrates that planned interventions can promote spatial balance prior to demographic pressure. Thus, the principal issue in Tabriz is not merely service scarcity, but spatial misalignment between service allocation and demographic dynamics. The Continuation of this pattern may intensify access inequalities and increase functional pressure on the central core. Revising service location policies, strengthening peripheral service centers, and systematically incorporating non-stationary spatial models into urban decision-making are essential steps toward realizing sustainable spatial justice in Tabriz.
 
Funding
There is no funding support.
 
Authors’ Contribution Statements
Mohammad Shali: Supervision, project administration, conceptualization, methodology design, data analysis, writing – original draft, and final approval of the version to be published
Hessam Esmaeili Qezeljeh Meydan: Data collection and updating, literature review, and initial draft preparation
 
Conflict of Interest
Authors declared no conflict of interest.
 
Acknowledgments
We are grateful to all the scientific consultants of this paper.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Spatial Distribution
  • Urban Services
  • Geographically Weighted Regression (GWR)
  • Tabriz Metropolis
  1. امانپور، سعید؛ ملکی، سعید و حسینی، نبی‌الله. (1395). تحلیلی بر توزیع خدمات شهری در کلان‌شهر اهواز از منظر عدالت فضایی. فصلنامه علمی پژوهش‌های بوم‌شناسی شهری، 7(14)، 99-112. doi:20.1001.1.25383930.1395.7.14.7.9
  2. پورمراد، آزیتا و یاسوری، مجید. (1403). بررسی عدالت فضایی در شهر با تأکید بر توزیع خدمات شهری، مطالعه موردی: شهر بندر انزلی. مجله پژوهش و فناوری محیط‌زیست، 9(15)، 165-183. doi:10.61186/jert.46769.9.15.183
  3. جباری، علیرضا؛ صمدزاده، رسول و وثیق، یوسف. (1403). سنجش و ارزیابی پراکنش خدمات شهری در نواحی شهر اردبیل. نشریه پژوهش‌های بوم‌شناسی شهری، 15(37)، 61-80. doi: 10.30473/grup.2023.65903.2744
  4. جعفری، فیروز، اصغری زمانی، اکبر و سلیمانی راد، اسماعیل. (1402). بررسی توزیع خدمات شهری در راستای عدالت فضایی با تأکید بر ساختار جمعیتی (مطالعه موردی: شهر تبریز). جغرافیای اجتماعی شهری، 10(2)، 237-256.
  5.  doi: 10.22103/JUSG.2023.2113
  6. محمدی، چنور. (1403). ارزیابی شاخص‌های خدمات شهری در مناطق کلان‌شهر کرمانشاه. مجله جغرافیا و روابط انسانی، 7(2)، 72-83. doi: 10.22034/gahr.2023.421806.1972
  7. رخشانی نسب، حمیدرضا؛ سلیمانی دامنه، مجتبی و کاخا، معصومه. (1404). ارزیابی و تحلیل توزیع فضایی خدمات بهداشتی و درمانی در سطح شهرستان‌های استان قزوین. مجله آمایش سرزمین، 17(1)، 149-167.  doi: 10.22059/jtcp.2025.394117.670504
  8. رمضانی، مجید و منوچهری میاندوآب، ایوب. (1401). تحلیل فضایی دسترسی گروه‌های فقیر به خدمات شهری (مورد: شهر ارومیه). آمایش فضا و ژئوماتیک، 26(3)، 74-104.  doi: 10.2022/hsmsp.26.3.4
  9. سرور، هوشنگ؛ لاله پور، منیژه و سربازگلی، سولماز. (1395). ارزیابی و تحلیل فضایی پراکنش جمعیت و توزیع خدمات در نواحی شهری تبریز. جغرافیا، 14(51)، 305-324.
  10. رضائی، شهریار؛ آریان، اشکان و محمدپور، صابر. (1404). تحلیلی بر پراکنش خدمات شهری با تأکید بر رویکرد عدالت فضایی (مطالعه موردی: شهر مشهد). نشریه اقتصاد و برنامه‌ریزی شهری، 6(1)، 96-117.
  11. doi:10.22034/uep.2025.499567.1586
  12. صابری، علی؛ پوراحمد، احمد و زنگنه شهرکی، سعید. (1403). تحلیل توزیع خدمات شهری و شناسایی پیشران‌های مؤثر بر عدالت فضایی با رویکرد آینده‌پژوهی (موردمطالعه: شهر یاسوج). جغرافیا و برنامه‌ریزی، 28(88)، 191-164.
  13.  doi: 10.22034/gp.2023.54478.3068
  14. مختاری اصل، غلامرضا؛ معصومی، محمدتقی و صمدزاده، رسول. (1404). واکاوی تمایزهای فضایی در برقراری عدالت افقی از نظر برخورداری از خدمات آموزشی با رویکرد تصمیم‌گیری چند معیاره و GIS (مطالعه موردی: محلات شهر اردبیل). نشریه کاربرد سنجش‌ازدور و سیستم اطلاعات جغرافیایی در علوم محیطی، 5(15)، 23-1. doi: 10.22034/rsgi.2025.66464.1129
  15. منوچهری میاندوآب، ایوب و انوری، آرزو. (1404). تحلیلی بر عدالت فضایی خدمات آموزشی (مدارس) در محلات شهر ارومیه. رویکردهای نوین در مدیریت آموزشی، 1(2)، 57-72.  doi: 10.30466/ntea.2025.56122.1020
  16. میرکتولی، جعفر؛ آریان کیا، مصطفی و کریمی آغچه، راضیه. (1404). تحلیل فضایی خدمات شهری با رویکرد عدالت فضایی مطالعه موردی: شهر ایلام. مجله آمایش جغرافیایی فضا، 15(1)، 1-19.  doi: 10.30488/gps.2025.473577.3772
  17. نصرتی، بهنوش و شکور، علی. (1401). تحلیلی بر شاخص‌های حکمروایی خوب شهری با رویکرد عدالت فضائی کلان‌شهر شیراز. پژوهش و برنامه‌ریزی شهری، 13(48)، 221-234.  doi:10.30495/jupm.2022.29392.4062
  18. Amanpour, S., Maleki, S. and Hosseini, N. A. (2017). Analyzing the Distribution of Urban Services in Metropolis Ahvaz From a Spatial Justice Perspective. Journal of Urban Ecology Researches, 7(14), 99-112. doi:20.1001.1.25383930.1395.7.14.7.9 [In Persian].
  19. Apparicio, P., Abdelmajid, M., Riva, M., & Shearmur, R. (2008). Comparing alternative approaches to measuring the geographical accessibility of urban health services: Distance types and aggregation-error issues. International journal of health geographics, 7(1), 7. doi: 10.1186/1476-072X-7-7
  20. Ashik, F. R., Islam, M. S., Alam, M. S., Tabassum, N. J., & Manaugh, K. (2024). Dynamic equity in urban amenities distribution: An accessibility-driven assessment. Applied Geography, 164, 103199. doi: 10.1016/j.apgeog.2024.103199
  21. Ashik, F. R., Mim, S. A., & Neema, M. N. (2020). Towards vertical spatial equity of urban facilities: An integration of spatial and aspatial accessibility. Journal of Urban Management, 9(1), 77-92. doi: 10.1016/j.jum.2019.12.004
  22. Chen, X., Zhang, Q., & Zhang, H. (2024). Disparities in the geospatial allocation of public facilities from the perspective of living circles. Open Geosciences, 16(1), 20220654. doi: 10.1515/geo-2022-0654
  23. Chen, Y., Hu, Y., & Lai, L. (2022). Demography-oriented urban spatial matching of service facilities: Case study of changchun, China. Land, 11(10), 1660. doi:10.3390/land11101660
  24. Chen, Y., Zhang, Z., Lang, L., Long, Z., Wang, N., Chen, X., ... & Li, Y. (2023). Measuring the spatial match between service facilities and population distribution: Case of Lanzhou. Land, 12(8), 1549. doi:10.3390/land12081549
  25. Domnich, A., Arata, L., Amicizia, D., Signori, A., Gasparini, R., & Panatto, D. (2016). Assessing spatial inequalities in accessing community pharmacies: a mixed geographically weighted approach. Geospatial Health, 11(3). doi:10.4081/gh.2016.431
  26. Fanelli, F., Melo, H. P., Bruno, M., & Loreto, V. (2025). Revealing the core-periphery structure of cities. Physical Review Research, 7(3), 033064. doi:10.1103/PhysRevResearch.7.033064
  27. Gorjian, M. (2025). Statistical Economic Perspectives on Urban Inequality: A Systematic Review of GIS-Based Methodologies and Applications.
  28. He, S., Wu, Y., & Wang, L. (2020). Characterizing horizontal and vertical perspectives of spatial equity for various urban green spaces: a case study of Wuhan, China. Frontiers in public health, 8, 10. doi:10.3389/fpubh.2020.00010
  29. Hossain, M. A., Sultana, S., & Nazem, N. I. (2021). Spatial distribution of strategic service infrastructures that favour quality of life (QOL) in the Greater Dhaka Region (GDR), Bangladesh. SN Social Sciences, 1(8), 205. doi:10.1007/s43545-021-00222-0
  30. Jabari, A., Samadzadeh, R. and Vasig, Y. (2024). Measuring and Evaluating the Distribution of City Services in the Areas of Ardabil City. Journal of Urban Ecology Researches, 15(4), 61-80. doi: 10.30473/grup.2023.65903.2744 [In Persian].
  31. Jafari, F., Asghari Zamani, A. and Soleimanirad, E. (2023). Evaluation the distribution of urban services in line with spatial justice with an emphasis on population structure (case study: Tabriz city). Journal of Urban Social Geography, 10(2), 237-256. doi: 10.22103/JUSG.2023.2113 [In Persian].
  32. Levers, C., Brückner, M., & Lakes, T. (2010, May). Social segregation in urban areas–an exploratory data analysis using geographically weighted regression analysis. In 13th AGILE International Conference on Geographic Information Science (Vol. 2010).
  33. Li, T., Fang, X., Zhu, J., Peng, Q., Zhao, W., & Fu, X. (2024). Horizontal and vertical Spatial equity analysis based on accessibility to living service amenities: A case study of Xi’an, China. Land, 13(8), 1113. doi:10.3390/land13081113
  34. Malaker, T., & Meng, Q. (2024). Urban Disparity Analytics Using GIS: A Systematic Review. Sustainability, 16(14), 5956. doi:10.3390/su16145956
  35. Manouchehri Miandoab, A., & Anvari, A. (2025). Assessing the Spatial Equity of Educational Services in the Neighborhoods of Urmia City. New Approaches in Educational Management, 1(2), 57-72. doi: 10.30466/ntea.2025.56122.1020 [In Persian].
  36. Mirkatouli, J., Ariankia, M., & Karimi Aghcheh, R. (2025). Spatial Analysis of Urban Services with a Spatial Justice Approach: A case study of Ilam city. Geographical planning of space quarterly journal, 15(1), 1-19. doi:10.30488/gps.2025.473577.3772 [In Persian].
  37. Mohammadi, Ch. (2024). Evaluation of urban service indicators in Kermanshah metropolitan areas. Journal of Geography and Human Relations, 7(2), 72-83. doi: 10.22034/gahr.2023.421806.1972 [In Persian]
  38. mokhtariasl, G., masoumi, M., & samadzadeh, R. (2025). Analyzing spatial distinctions in establishing horizontal justice in terms of access to educational services using a multi-criteria decision-making approach and GIS (Case study: Ardabil city neighborhoods). Remote Sensing and GIS Applications in Environmental Sciences, 5(15), 23-1. doi: 10.22034/rsgi.2025.66464.1129[In Persian].
  39. Nicholls, S. (2001). Measuring the accessibility and equity of public parks: A case study using GIS. Managing leisure, 6(4), 201-219. doi:10.1080/13606710110084651
  40. Nicklisch, A., & Paetzel, F. (2020). Need-based justice and distribution procedures: The perspective of economics. In Need-Based Distributive Justice: An Interdisciplinary Perspective (pp. 161-189). Cham: Springer International Publishing. doi:10.1007/978-3-030-43764-1_8
  41. Nosrati, B., & Shakoor, A. (2022). Analysis on Indicators of Good Urban Governance with Spatial Justice Approach in Shiraz Municipal Areas. research and urban planning, 13(48), 221-234. doi:10.30495/jupm.2022.29392.4062 [In Persian].
  42. Pang, R., Xiao, J., Yang, J., & Sun, W. (2025). Spatial Distribution Characteristics and Influencing Factors of Public Service Facilities for Children—A Case Study of the Central Urban Area of Shenyang. Land, 14(7), 1485. doi:10.3390/land14071485
  43. Pormorad, A., & Yasouri, M. (2024). Study of Urban Spatial Justice with an Emphasis on Distribution of urban services, Case study: Bandar anzali city. Journal of Environmental Research and Technology, 9(15), 165-183. doi:10.61186/jert.46769.9.15.183. [In Persian].
  44. Rakhshaninasab, H. R., Soleimani Damaneh, M., & Kakha, M. (2025). Check and Analysis of Unequal Spatial Distribution of Healthcare Services in the County of Qazvin Province. Town and Country Planning, 17(1), 149-167. doi:10.22059/jtcp.2025.394117.670504 [In Persian].
  45. ramezani,M. and manouchehri,A. (2022). Spatial analysis of poor groups' access to urban services (Case: Urmia City). The Journal of Spatial Planning and Geomatics, 26(3), 74-104. doi: 10.2022/hsmsp.26.3.4 [In Persian].
  46. Rawls, J. (1971). A Theory of Justice. Harvard University Press.
  47. Rezaee, S., Aryan, A., & Mohammadpour, S. (2025). An Analysis of the Distribution of Urban Services with an Emphasis on the Spatial Justice Approach (Case Study: Mashhad City). Urban Economics and Planning, 6(1), 96-117. doi:10.22034/uep.2025.499567.1586 [In Persian].
  48. saberi, A., Pourahmad, A., & zanganeh Shahraki, S. (2024). Analyzing the distribution of urban services and identifying drivers affecting spatial justice with a Future study approach (case study: Yasouj city). Journal of Geography and Planning, 28(88), 191-164. doi: 10.22034/gp.2023.54478.3068 [In Persian].
  49. Sarvar, H, Lalepour, M. & Sarbazgholi, S. (2017). The Evaluating of Spatial Distribution of Population and Services in Urban Zones of Tabriz. Geography, 14(51), 305-324. [In Persian].
  50. Setianto, M. A. S., & Gamal, A. (2021, February). Spatial justice in the distribution of public services. In IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science (Vol. 673, No. 1, p. 012024). IOP Publishing. doi:10.1088/1755-1315/673/1/012024
  51. Shao, H., Lv, S., & Cao, C. (2023). The fairness and influencing factors of the spatial distribution of public services in Beijing–Tianjin–Hebei. Sustainability, 15(12), 9217. doi:10.3390/su15129217
  52. Sharma, G., & Patil, G. R. (2024). Urban spatial structure and equity for urban services through the lens of accessibility. Transport Policy, 146, 72-90. doi:10.1016/j.tranpol.2024.02.017
  53. Talen, E. (1998). Benefit-cost analysis of neighborhood accessibility: Implications for urban planning. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 18(2), 137–153.
  54. Urrutia-Mosquera, J., Flórez-Calderón, L., Cortés, Y., Troncoso, R., & Lufin, M. (2024). Impact of urban facilities spatial inequality on sustainable travel mode. PloS one, 19(10), e0308610. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0308610
  55. Wu, P., & Liu, M. (2022). A framework for the spatial inequality in urban public facility for urban planning, design and management. Land, 11(9), 1429. doi:10.3390/land11091429