انگیزه ‌کشاورزان در سند‌دار کردن زمین‌ در روستاهای شهرستان دالاهو

نوع مقاله : مقاله مستخرج از پایان نامه

نویسندگان

1 گروه جغرافیا، دانشکده ادبیات و علوم انسانی، دانشگاه رازی، کرمانشاه، ایران

2 گروه حقوق، دانشکده ادبیات و علوم انسانی، دانشگاه رازی، کرمانشاه، ایران

10.22098/gsd.2026.18767.1102

چکیده

این پژوهش در حوزه چالش‌ها و حقوق ثبت‌اسناد و سنددار کردن زمین‌های زراعی است. قوانین متعددی که در مورد سنددار کردن اراضی کشاورزی تصویب و اجرایی شده است؛ ولی کشاورزان تمایل کمی دارند که اراضی خود را سنددار کنند. دلایل متعددی در این زمینه وجود دارد. این تحقیق با هدف بررسی علل و عوامل عدم تمایل کشاورزان به سنددار کردن زمین‌های زراعی خود در مناطق روستایی در شهرستان دالاهو انجام می‌گیرد. روش تحقیق کمی، توصیفی تحلیلی است که داده‌های لازم با ابزار پرسش‌نامه جمع‌آوری شدند. حجم نمونه با استفاده از فرمول کوکران برابر با 265 نفر تعیین شد. پایایی تحقیق توسط ضریب آلفای کرونباخ (برابر با 74/0) و روایی توسط متخصصان جغرافیا و حقوق بررسی شد. یافته‌ها حاکی از آن است که نبود آگاهی نسبت به قوانین، هزینه‌های مختلف سنددار کردن، چالش‌های مالکیت زمین و اختلافات بین افراد جزو عواملی است که سنددار کردن زمین‌ها را با چالش روبرو کرده است. از منافع سنددار کردن زمین‌ها می‌توان به اشتغال‌زایی و افزایش سرمایه‌گذاری بر زمین‌ها از طریق اعطای وام و بهسازی زمین‌ها اشاره کرد. نتایج نشان می‌دهند که بین صدور سند کشاورزی با مؤلفه‌های اقتصادی در سطح 05/0 و اجتماعی و آموزشی در سطح 01/0 وجود دارد. یافته‌های رگرسیون نشان می‌دهند که در بین متغیرها، متغیر اجتماعی مهم‌ترین عامل انگیزه صدور سند برای زمین‌های کشاورزی در میان روستاییان است.

کلیدواژه‌ها


عنوان مقاله [English]

Farmers' Motivation for Documenting Land in the Villages of Dalahu County

نویسندگان [English]

  • Mahsa Koranian 1
  • Aeizh Azmi 1
  • Khadijeh Moradi 2
1 Department of Geography, Faculty of Literature and Humanities, Razi University, Kermanshah, Iran
2 Department of Law, Faculty of Literature and Humanities, Razi University, Kermanshah, Iran
چکیده [English]

A B S T R A C T
This research addresses the challenges and legal rights associated with registering documents and documenting agricultural lands. Several laws have been enacted and implemented regarding the documentation of agricultural lands, yet farmers show little inclination to document their lands. There are several reasons for this. This research aims to investigate the causes and factors underlying farmers' reluctance to document their agricultural lands in rural areas of Dalahu County. The research method is quantitative, descriptive, and analytical, and the necessary data were collected using a questionnaire. The sample size was determined using the Cochran formula as 265 respondents. The reliability of the research was assessed using Cronbach's alpha coefficient (0.74), and validity was evaluated by experts in geography and law. The findings indicate that lack of awareness of the laws, various documentation costs, land ownership challenges, and disputes between individuals are among the factors that have made land documentation challenging. The benefits of land deeding include job creation and increased investment in land through credit access and land improvement. The results show that there is a relationship between the issuance of agricultural documents and economic components at the 0.05 level, and with social and educational components at the 0.01 level. Regression findings show that among the variables, the social variable is the most important factor motivating the issuance of documents for agricultural lands among villagers, followed by the educational factor and finally the economic factor.
Extended Abstract
Introduction
This research addresses the challenges and legal rights related to document registration and the documentation of agricultural lands. Several laws have been approved and implemented regarding the documentation of agricultural lands, yet farmers show little inclination to document their lands. Kermanshah Province, particularly Dalahu County, is among the provinces where the issue of land documentation has been addressed and several measures have been taken in this regard. However, in Dalahu County, some agricultural villages have not yet been documented, and there is little interest among rural residents in documenting their lands. However, due to the negative impacts of undocumented land, such as the inability to mechanize land, lack of access to loans, and legal conflicts and inheritance issues, it is necessary to take measures to address the causes and factors affecting land documentation, and the purpose of this research is to examine these causes. Therefore, the main purpose of this research is to investigate the causes and motivations of farmers' reluctance to document their agricultural lands in selected rural areas of Dalahu County.
 
Methodology
In this study, the statistical population consists of villagers in Dalahu County. Rural households are considered the statistical population. For sampling in this study, a multi-stage cluster sampling method is employed. In this case, the statistical population is divided into relatively homogeneous groups or classes based on geographical and demographic characteristics. Once the classes are formed, a sample is selected from each class separately, and finally simple random sampling is performed to select a sample from each class.
 
Results and Discussion
The effect of issuing title deeds on the willingness of villagers shows that obtaining a single-page title deed reduces tensions and disputes, provides well-being and peace of mind, facilitates access to loans, enables the signing of deeds, and provides training courses. However, villagers were satisfied in the social dimension, particularly in terms of sympathy, peace of mind, and sense of belonging, and on the other hand, their awareness of the title deed, related laws, and issuance procedures is low. Lack of awareness among the people, absence of training courses, migration of villagers, delays in issuing documents, and the existence of cumbersome laws have led to their relative deprivation with respect to the single-page title deed. Overall, this study showed that people's willingness to obtain title deeds has led to changes in the economic, social, and educational dimensions in rural areas. The findings of the study show that among the economic, social, and educational dimensions, the social dimension has the highest priority and the economic dimension has the lowest priority. The educational dimension is the second priority. Unlike most countries, the Iranian cadastral system focuses primarily on the registered cadastre, which is managed by the General Directorate of Cadastre of the Document and Property Registration Organization.
 
Conclusion
Cadastral maps prevent violations of treasury rights, land grabbing, forgery, and related offenses. If the cadastre is properly implemented, it will determine land boundaries and reduce land disparities. Additionally, the integration of agricultural lands is one of the issues of concern to the legislator. According to the information and surveys obtained on the number of agricultural land users in the country, more than half of these users operate small and uneconomic plots of less than two hectares, which indicates the uneconomic condition of agriculture on such lands. The implementation of the document issuance plan may not be successful in achieving the comprehensive development of the village. The necessity of implementing other plans in the village has contributed to its more effective implementation and will lead to comprehensive development in the village and greater success of the ownership document issuance plan in the village under study. One of the benefits of documenting land is job creation and increased investment in land through the provision of loans and land improvement. The findings of the research show that there is a difference between the issuance of agricultural documents and economic components at the 0.05 level, and social and educational components at the 0.01 level. The regression findings show that among the variables, the social variable is the most important motivational factor for issuing documents for agricultu.
 
Funding
There is no funding support.
 
Authors’ Contribution
Authors contributed equally to the conceptualization and writing of the article. All of the authors approved thecontent of the manuscript and agreed on all aspects of the work declaration of competing interest none.
 
Conflict of Interest
Authors declared no conflict of interest.
 
Acknowledgments
We are grateful to all the scientific consultants of this paper.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Documentation
  • Agricultural Land
  • Land Registration Status
  • Dalahu County
  1. انجیری، کیوان. (۱۳۹۹). بیع اراضی و ساختمان‌های فاقد سند رسمی. نشریه تحقیقات حقوق قضایی، 2(2)، ۹۷۸-100.
  2. ایران‌خواه خانقاه، سهیلا و قدیری معصوم، مجتبی. (۱۳۹۱). تأثیر صدور سند مالکیت مساکن روستایی در توسعه روستایی مطالعه موردی روستای آهار گلدسته. نشریه جغرافیای سرزمین، 9(34):۳۴ -۱۹.
  3. بحری، ادریس. (۱۳۹۹). نقد و بررسی قانون تعیین تکلیف وضعیت ثبتی اراضی و ساختمان‌های فاقد سند رسمی. نهمین همایش ملی پژوهش‌های مدیریت و علوم‌انسانی در ایران،۲۱ اسفند1399، مؤسسه پژوهشی مدیریت مدبر، صص 22-2.
  4. رئوفی راد، فاطمه و داورزنی، حسین. (1397). تبیین نقش کاداستر در پیشگیری از جرایم ثبت. ماهنامه بین‌المللی پژوهش ملل، 4(37):23-1.
  5. حبیبی درگاه، بهنام. (1399). مفهوم کاداستر کارکرد و آثار آن. فصلنامه علمی پژوهش‌های نوین حقوق اداری، 2(3)،62-229.
  6. سازمان امور اراضی. (۱۳۸۹). مجموعه قوانین و مقررات مرتبط با حفظ کاربری اراضی زراعی و باغ‌ها. چاپ اول، تهران: نشر آموزش کشاورزی.
  7. شریعتی، مهدی. (۱۳۹۸). بررسی نحوه مستندسازی اراضی کشاورزی فاقد سند مالکیت رسمی. کنفرانس ملی حقوق در چشم‌انداز،۲۲ دی ۱۳۹۸، سازمان بسیج مهندسی صنعتی استان گیلان، صص 14-2.
  8. عباسی، محمد؛ جمال دینی، علی و اسمعیل‌پور، مرضیه. (۱۳۹۴). رابطه مدیریت نوین روستایی با توسعه روستایی. دومین کنفرانس بین‌المللی پژوهش‌های نوین در عمران، معماری و شهرسازی، شرکت مدیران ایده‌پردازان پایتخت ایلیا صص،۱۳-۲.
  9. علیزاده، کتایون، کیخا، زهرا.(۱۳۸۹). تأثیر یکپارچه‌سازی اراضی بر عملکرد محصولات کشاورزی دهستان لوتک شهرستان زابل. فصل نامه جغرافیایی چشم‌انداز زاگرس،2(3)، ۱۵۲-۱۴۰.
  10. فرامرزپور، قادر. (1398). آثار اجرایی‌شدن طرح کاداستر بر روابط حقوقی اشخاص شخص. مجله کانون، 52(4)، 35-26
  11. قاسمی قاسموند، علیرضا. (۱۳۹۸). بررسی قانون تعیین تکلیف وضعیت ثبتی اراضی و ساختمان‌های فاقد سند رسمی. نشریه پژوهش‌های حقوقی قانون بار، 2(8)، ۶۳-۱.
  12. گلیج، محمدرضا و شریف‌زادگان، محمدحسین. (1400). تدوین چهارچوب نظری و مفهومی تبیین نقش حقوق مالکیت زمین در برنامه‌ریزی فضایی شهری، دانش شهرسازی، 5(4)، 289-214.  doi: 10. 2124/upk.2022.20497.1674
  13. محمدی، شیوا و خردمندی، سعید. (1399). واکاوی علل عدم موفقیت طرح کاداستر در کشور از دیدگاه حقوق اداری. فصلنامه علمی پژوهش‌های نوین حقوق اداری، 2(5)، 195-111.
  14. ملک جعفریان، روح اله. (1389). بررسی نظریات مربوط به فرایند تصمیم‌گیری و انتخاب استراتژی، ماهنامه اجتماعی، اقتصادی، علمی و فرهنگی کار و جامعه، 162، 73-67.
  15. Abbasi, M., Jamaldini, A., & Esmaeil Pour, M. (2015). The relationship between modern rural management and rural development. Second International Conference on Modern Research in Civil Engineering, Architecture and Urban Planning, Ilya Capital Idea Managers Company, pp. 2-13. [in Persian].
  16. Alizadeh, K., & Keykha, Z. (2009). The effect of land consolidation on the performance of agricultural products in Lotak village, Zabol city. Zagros Geographic Quarterly, 2(3), 152-140. [in Persian].
  17. Anjiri, K. (2012). Sale of Land and Buildings Without Official Documents. Journal of Judicial Law Research, 2(2), 978-100. [in Persian].
  18. Aydinoglu, A. C., & Rabia, B. (2017). Generic land registry and cadastre, 68(c), 59-71. doi: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2017.07.029.
  19. Bacior, S.  (2023). Austrian Cadastre still in use – Example proceedings to determine the legal status of land property in southern Poland. Land Use Policy, 131(c), 1-15. doi: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2023.106740.
  20. Bahri, I. (2012). Critique and Study of the Law for Determining the Registration Status of Land and Buildings Without Official Documents. 9th National Conference on Management and Humanities Research in Iran, March 11, 2019, Modaber Management Research Institute, pp. 2-22. [in Persian].
  21. Bański, J. (2017). The consequences of changes of ownership for agricultural land use in Central European countries following the collapse of the Eastern Bloc. Land Use Policy, 66(3), 120-130.Doi: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2017.04.045
  22. Dawidowicz, A., & Źróbek, R. (2018). A methodological evaluation of the Polish cadastral system based on the global cadastral model. Land Use Policy, 73(4), 59-72. doi: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2018.01.037.
  23. Ercan, O. (2021). A closer look at Turkish cadastre and its successful completion. Land Use Policy, 110(202), 1-12.doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.104951.
  24. Faramarzpour, G. (2019). The effects of the implementation of the cadastre plan on the legal relations of individuals. Kanoon Magazine, 52(4), 35-26. [in Persian].
  25. Ghasemi Ghasemmond, A. (2019). Study of the law on determining the registration status of lands and buildings without official documents. Legal Research Journal of the Bar Law, 2(8), 63-1. [in Persian].
  26. Golij, M. R., & Sharifzadegan, M. H. (2000). Developing a theoretical and conceptual framework to explain the role of land ownership rights in urban spatial planning. Urban Planning Science, 5(4), 289-214. doi: 10.22124/upk.2022.20497.1674[in Persian].
  27. Grant, D,, Enemark, J. Ze., Stig, , Mitchell, D., & McCamley, G. (2021).The Cadastral triangular model. Land Use Policy, 97(2021), 1-15. doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.104758.
  28. Habibi Dargah, B. (2010). The concept of functional cadastre and its effects. Journal of Modern Research in Administrative Law, 2(3), 229-262. [in Persian].
  29. Irankhah Khanghah, S., & Ghadiri Masoom, M. (2012). The Effect of Issuing Title Deeds for Rural Housing on Rural Development: A Case Study (Ahar Goldasteh Village). Journal of Land Geography, 9(34), 34-19[in Persian].
  30. Land Affairs Organization. (2010). Collection of laws and regulations related to the preservation of agricultural land and orchards. First edition, Tehran: Agricultural Education Publishing House[in Persian].
  31. Lutz, J., & Welsh, C. (2021). Foreign Purchases of U.S. Agricultural Land: Facts, Figures, and an Assessment of Real Threats. First edition, U.S.A: Center for Strategic and International Studies.
  32. Malek Jafarian, R. (2010). Review of theories related to the decision-making process and strategy selection, Social, Economic. Scientific and Cultural Monthly of Work and Society, 162, 73-67[in Persian].
  33. Mohammadi, Sh., & Kheradmandi, S. (2010). Analysis of the causes of the failure of the cadastral plan in the country from the perspective of administrative law. Journal of Modern Administrative Law Studies, 2(5), 195-111. [in Persian].
  34. Raofi Rad, F., & Davarzani, H. (2018). Explaining the Role of Cadastre in Preventing Registration Crimes. International Monthly Journal of Nations Research, 4(37), 23-1[in Persian].
  35. Shariati, M. (2019). Study of the method of documenting agricultural lands without official ownership documents. National Conference on Law in the Landscape, 12 January 2019, Gilan Province Industrial Engineering Basij Organization, pp. 2-14. [in Persian].
  36. Smith, T. (2023). Foreign Ownership of U.S. Agricultural Land. U.S.A:American action foroum, 1-7. 
  37. Stoter, J. E. (2004). 3D cadaster, Ph.D. thesis,Netherland:echnische Universiteit Delft the Netherland, 5-22.