تحلیل چند بعدی اثرات گردشگری شهری بر کیفیت زندگی شهری در هسته تاریخی تهران

نوع مقاله : علمی - پژوهشی

نویسندگان

گروه جغرافیای انسانی و برنامه‌ریزی، دانشکده جغرافیا، دانشگاه تهران، تهران، ایران

10.22098/gsd.2026.19211.1110

چکیده

گردشگری شهری در هسته‌های تاریخی شهرها می‌تواند پیامدهای متنوعی بر کیفیت زندگی ساکنان محلی ایجاد کند که عمدتاً در سطح ادراک و رضایت ساکنان نمود می‌یابند. با وجود تمرکز بالای فعالیت‌های گردشگری در منطقه ۱۲ تهران، ارزیابی نظام‌مند اثرات ادراکی گردشگری بر ابعاد مختلف کیفیت زندگی محدود است. پژوهش حاضر با هدف تحلیل چندبعدی اثرات ادراکی گردشگری شهری بر کیفیت زندگی ساکنان این منطقه انجام شد. مطالعه از نوع توصیفی-تحلیلی و با رویکرد کاربردی است. داده‌ها از طریق پرسش‌نامه و بر اساس دیدگاه ۲۲۷ نفر از ساکنان هفت محله منتخب جمع‌آوری و با استفاده از آمار توصیفی، آزمون تی تک‌نمونه‌ای، تحلیل واریانس یک‌طرفه و رگرسیون چندمتغیره تحلیل شدند. یافته‌ها نشان می‌دهد گردشگری شهری بر ابعاد کالبدی-زیرساختی، اجتماعی، فرهنگی و تفریحی اثرات مثبت متفاوت و بر بعد اقتصادی تأثیر محدود دارد؛ چالش‌های زیست‌محیطی همچنان از محدودیت‌های اصلی محسوب می‌شوند. این مطالعه تأکید می‌کند که کیفیت زندگی در مناطق گردشگرپذیر پدیده‌ای چندبعدی و مبتنی بر ادراک است و ارزیابی اثرات گردشگری باید مستقیماً با دیدگاه ساکنان و محدودیت‌های داده‌های ادراکی انجام شود.  

کلیدواژه‌ها


عنوان مقاله [English]

A Multidimensional Analysis of Urban Tourism Impacts on Residents’ Quality of Life: A case study of Tehran’s Historic Core

نویسندگان [English]

  • Ali Hosseini
  • Haniyeh Amiri
Department of Human Geography and Planning, Faculty of Geography, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran
چکیده [English]

A B S T R A C T
Urban tourism in the historical cores of cities can generate diverse impacts on the quality of life of local residents, which primarily manifest at the level of perceptions and satisfaction. Despite the high concentration of tourism activities in District 12 of Tehran, systematic assessment of the perceived effects of urban tourism on different dimensions of residents' quality of life remains limited. This study aims to analyze the multidimensional perceived impacts of urban tourism on residents' quality of life in this area. The research is descriptive–analytical with an applied approach. Data were collected through a questionnaire based on the views of 227 residents from seven selected neighborhoods and analyzed using descriptive statistics, one-sample t-tests, one-way ANOVA, and multivariate regression. Findings indicate that urban tourism has varying positive effects on the physical–infrastructural, social, cultural, and leisure dimensions, while its impact on the economic dimension is limited; environmental challenges remain a major constraint. The study emphasizes that quality of life in tourist-receiving areas is a multidimensional and perception-based phenomenon, and the assessment of urban tourism impacts should be directly grounded in residents’ perspectives and the limitations of perceptual data.
Extended Abstract
Introduction
Urban tourism, as one of the most dynamic socio-economic activities in contemporary cities, plays a pivotal role in shaping spatial, economic, and social transformations. It can significantly influence the quality of life of urban residents. With the expansion of cities and the increasing complexity of urban structures, understanding the consequences of urban tourism, particularly in historical areas, has become increasingly important. Quality of life is a multidimensional concep encompassing economic, social, cultural, environmental, physical, health and hygiene, and leisure aspects, and measuring it provides a comprehensive perspective on the positive and negative outcomes of tourism development.
District 12 of Tehran, as a historic and cultural core of the capital, is one of the main urban tourism destinations, featuring high concentrat-
ration of historical, religious, and cultural attractions. At the same time, residents face multiple challenges related to urban tourism management and quality of life. Therefore, examining the impacts of urban tourism on the residents’ quality of life in this district can provide the foundation for developing effective strategies for sustainable urban development.
Specifically, this research seeks to answer the following questions: What is the current status of quality of life and urban tourism development in District 12 of Tehran? Which factors contribute to improving household quality of life in the context of tourism development? And what is the nature of the relationship between urban tourism development and the enhancement of residents’ quality of life in this district? The findings of this study can serve as a basis for formulating policies and strategies aimed at sustainable urban tourism development and improving the quality of life of residents in historical areas of Tehran.
 
Methodology
Thisstudy adopts an applied descriptive–analytical approach. Research variables and indicators were extracted from an extensive literature review in the fields of urban tourism and quality of life. The main research variables include "urban tourism impacts" and "quality of life," encompassing economic, social, cultural, environmental, physical, health and hygiene, infrastructure and facilities, and leisure dimensions. The study population comprised residents of seven neighborhoods in District 12: Emamzadeh Yahya, Pamenar, Baharestan, Darvazeh Shemiran, Bazaar, Ferdowsi, and Sanglaj. These neighborhoods were selected due to their historic urban fabric, with buildings aged between 200 and 400 years, and their concentration of tourist attractions. A total of 228 respondents were selected using simple random sampling proportional to the distribution of tourist sites across neighborhoods. Questionnaires were validated using content validity and tested for reliability using Cronbach’s alpha, yielding a coefficient of 0.893, indicating high reliability. Data were analyzed using SPSS, employing descriptive statistics, one-sample t-tests, one-way ANOVA with post hoc tests, Pearson correlation, and regression analyses to examine relationships between urban tourism and quality of life dimensions.
 
Results and discussion
The findings indicate that urban tourism in District 12 has significant impacts on residents’ quality of life, generating both positive and negative effects. Among the most prominent positive outcomes are improvements in infrastructure and urban facilities, particularly public transportation, which have enhanced residents’ access to urban services, increased satisfaction, and improved the efficiency of urban service networks. These enhancements have contributed to a better urban living experience for residents and facilitated tourists’ mobility. Conversely, the economic dimension revealed the most significant negative effects. Rising living costs, increased prices of goods and services, intensified urban traffic, and pressure on local resources represent key challenges that residents face. If unmanaged, these issues could result in social dissatisfaction and a reduction in the quality of life, particularly among vulnerable groups. Environmental concerns, including increased pollution, waste generation, and degradation of urban environments, highlight the need for careful planning. Cultural concerns, such as weakening of local identity and the gradual erosion of indigenous values due to high tourist inflows, underscore the importance of preserving cultural authenticity through informed policies. Analysis of interrelationships among quality of life variables showed significant correlations between infrastructure, health and hygiene, economic, social, cultural, environmental, and leisure dimensions. This demonstrates the multidimensional and interconnected nature of quality of life, emphasizing the need for an integrated and holistic approach to urban tourism planning. Effective management strategies should, therefore, consider the interactions among these variables to enhance residents’ well-being.
 
Conclusion
The study concludes that urban tourism development, when properly managed, can substantially improve the quality of life of residents in District 12. To achieve sustainable outcomes, comprehensive, targeted, and locally grounded tourism programs should be implemented. Recommendations include enhancing infrastructure and public facilities, promoting local culture and arts, expanding health and hygiene services, protecting the environment, strengthening economic foundations, and adopting participatory approaches. Active citizen engagement, inter-sectoral coordination, attention to local needs, creation of attractive public spaces, and improved public service quality are essential for fostering residents’ satisfaction and overall well-being. Properly managed urban tourism thus represents a valuable tool for sustainable urban development and the enhancement of quality of life in historical districts.
 
Funding
There was no financial support received for this research.
 
Authors’ Contribution
All authors contributed equally to the conceptualization, data collection, analysis, and writing of the manuscript. All authors reviewed and approved the final version of the manuscript and agreed to be accountable for all aspects of the work.
 
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest related to this study.
 
Acknowledgments
The authors would like to thank all the scientific consultants, experts, and residents who contributed to this research and provided valuable insights for data collection and analysis.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Urban Tourism
  • Historic Core
  • Quality of Life
  • Urban complexity
  • Resident Satisfaction
  • District 12 of Tehran
  1. احمدی، حسن و بهجتی، فاطمه. (1404). تحلیلی بر اثرات توسعه گردشگری بر کیفیت زندگی شهروندان مطالعه موردی: شهر کرمان. اقتصاد و برنامه‌ریزی شهری، 6 (3)، 72 -85. doi: 10.22034/uep.2025.521729.1639
  2. اسدی پیمان، زهرا؛ توکلی نیا، جمیله؛ رضویان، محمدتقی و قورچی، مرتضی. (1399). ارزیابی کیفیت مقصد گردشگری مرکز شهر تهران مطالعه موردی: بازار بزرگ، منطقه 12 تهران. مجله گردشگری شهری، 7(3)، 35-50. doi: 10.22059/jut.2020.308107.822
  3. حسینی، علی و صابری، علی. (1401). ارزیابی تطبیقی چند بعدی از مؤلفه‌های کیفیت زندگی ساکنان محلی با تأکید بر سیاست ارتقا به شهر در شهرهای استان فارس و کهگیلویه و بویراحمد. پژوهش‌های جغرافیای برنامه‌ریزی شهری، 10(4)، 1-22. doi: 10.22059/jurbangeo.2023.345085.1712
  4. حسینی، علی و صابری، علی. (1402). تحلیل کیفیت زندگی در قبل و بعد از تبدیل سکونتگاه‌ها به شهر (مطالعه موردی: شهرهای مصیری و کوپن، استان فارس). جغرافیای اجتماعی شهری، 10(1)، 1-25.  doi: 10.22103/JUSG.2023.2086
  5. حویزاوی، حسن؛ صابری، حمید؛ اذانی، مهری و احمدی، فرشته. (۱۴۰۳). تبیین نقش مکان‌های سوم در ارتقاء کیفیت محیط شهری (مطالعه موردی: مناطق هشتگانه شهر اهواز). نشریه علمی اندیشه‌های نو در علوم جغرافیایی، ۲ (6). 187-223. doi: 10.22054/urdp.2023.75276.1574
  6. رنجبر، احسان؛ آیت‌اللهی طباطبایی، زهرا سادات و کشیش‌یانس، ارسینه. (1402). به‌سوی فرایند جامع ارزیابی کیفیت فضاهای عمومی شهری در شهرهای ایران. مجله علمی گفتمان طراحی شهری،4(1)، 115-134.
  7. رهنمایی، محمدتقی؛ ملک نیا، محبوبه و جهانیان، محبوبه (1390). نقش محورهای فرهنگی و تاریخی منطقه 12 در توسعه گردشگری شهر تهران. وزارت علوم، تحقیقات و فناوری - دانشگاه پیام نور - دانشگاه پیام نور استان تهران - دانشکده ادبیات و علوم انسانی.
  8. شکیب، هادی؛ شمس، مجید و ملک‌حسینی، عباس. (1404). گردشگری و توسعه پایدار شهری: مطالعه موردی شهر الشتر. تجلی هنر در معماری و شهرسازی، 3(2)، 1-26.
  9. شهرداری تهران. (۱۳۸۵). طرح تفصیلی منطقه ۱۲ شهر تهران (تجدید ساختار مرکز تاریخی) (ویرایش اول). مرکز مطالعات و برنامه‌ریزی شهر تهران.
  10. کریمیان بستانی، مریم و حسین‌زهی، اسماعیل. (1400). بررسی اثرات توسعه گردشگری بر ابعاد کیفیت زندگی در شهر چابهار. علوم جغرافیایی، 17(34)، 113-98
  11. ناروئی، بهروز؛ برق‌جلوه، شهین‌دخت؛ اسماعیل‌زاده، حسن و زبردست، لعبت. (۱۴۰۱). ارزیابی تغییرات فضایی-زمانی زیرساخت سبز شهری مبتنی بر الگوریتم درخت تصمیم‌گیری فرایندهای فضایی (مطالعه موردی: سیمای سرزمین تهران). فصلنامه علمی پژوهشی اطلاعات جغرافیایی، 31(122)، 167-188. doi: 10.22131/sepehr.2022.254788
  12. Ahirwar, R., Gupta, V., & Kumar, P. (2023). Urban tourism development and its socio-economic impacts. Journal of Urban Studies, 15(2), 45–62. https://doi.org/10.14505/jemt.v14.8(72).02
  13. Ahmadi, H., & Bahjati, F. (2025). An analysis of the effects of tourism development on the quality of life of citizens: A case study of Kerman City. Urban Economics and Planning, 6(3), 72–85. https://doi.org/10.22034/uep.2025.521729.1639[In Persian]
  14. Asadi Peyman, Z., Tavakolinia, J., Razavian, M. T., & Ghurchi, M. (2020). Assessing the quality of tourism destinations in the center of Tehran case study: Grand Bazaar (District 12 of Tehran). Urban Tourism, 7(3), 35–50. https://doi.org/10.22059/jut.2020.308107.822[In Persian]
  15. Berbekova, A., Zhang, L., & Ren, Y. (2025). Measuring urban tourism impacts on local communities: A multidimensional approach. Tourism and Hospitality Research, 26(1), 12–29. https://doi.org/10.22034/UEP.2023.419807.1415
  16. Capello, R., Cerisola, S., & Panzera, E. (2026). From optimal to efficient tourism flows in cities: An urban economics perspective. The Annals of Regional Science, 75, Article 21. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00168-026-01454-1
  17. Colomb, C., & Novy, J. (2016). Urban tourism, social innovation, and the role of local communities. Cities, 52, 1–9.
  18. Costanza, R., Fisher, B., Ali, S., Beer, C., Bond, L., Boumans, R., Danigelis, N. L., Dickinson, J., Elliott, C., Farley, J., Gayer, D. E., Glenn, L. M., Hudspeth, T., Mahoney, D., McCahill, L., McIntosh, B., Reed, B., Rizvi, S. A. T., Rizzo, D. M., ... & Snapp, R. (2007). Quality of life: An approach integrating opportunities, human needs, and subjective well-being. Ecological Economics, 61(2–3), 267–277. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2006.02.023
  19. Darkey, D., & Visagie, J. (2013). The more things change the more they remain the same: A study on the quality of life in an informal township in Tshwane. Habitat International, 39, 302–309. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2012.10.016
  20. Godovykh, M., Fyall, A., & Pizam, A. (2025). Exploring the impacts of tourism on the well-being of local communities. Sustainability, 17(13), Article 5849. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17135849
  21. Goerlich, F. J., & Reig, E. (2021). Quality of life ranking of Spanish cities: A non-compensatory approach. Cities, 109, Article 102979. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2020.102979
  22. Hosseini, A., & Saberi, A. (2023). Analysis of the quality of life before and after the transition of settlements to city (Case study: Masiri and Kopon Cities, Fars Province). Journal of Urban Social Geography, 10(1), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.22103/JUSG.2023.2086[In Persian]
  23. Hosseini, A., & Saberi, A. (2023). The multi-dimensional comparative evaluation of the components of the quality of life of local residents: The case study on cities of Fars and Kohgiluyeh and Boyer-Ahmad Provinces. Geographical Urban Planning Research (GUPR), 10(4), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.22059/jurbangeo.2023.345085.1712
  24. Hosseini, A., Finn, B. M., & Momeni, A. (2023). The complexities of urban informality: A multi-dimensional analysis of residents' perceptions of life, inequality, and access in an Iranian informal settlement. Cities, 132, Article 104099. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2022.104099
  25. Hosseini, A., Finn, B. M., Sajjadi, S. A., & Mosavei, T. (2023). Urban disparities and quality of life among Afghan refugees living in informal settlements in Mashhad, Iran. Applied Research in Quality of Life, 18(2), 1073–1097. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11482-022-10133-0
  26. Hovizavi, H., Saberi, H., Azani, M., & Ahmadi, F. (2024). The role of third places in enhancing urban environment quality: A case study of the eight districts of Ahvaz.  Andisheh-ye No Journal of Geographical Sciences, 2 (6), 187–223. https://doi.org/10.22054/urdp.2023.75276.1574[In Persian]
  27. Karimian Bastani, M., & Hosseinzehi, E. (2021). Investigating the effects of tourism development on dimensions of quality of life in Chabahar. Geographical Sciences, 17(34), 98–113. [In Persian]
  28. Li, G., & Weng, Q. (2007). Measuring the quality of life in the city of Indianapolis by integration of remote sensing and census data. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 28(2), 249–267. https://doi.org/10.1080/01431160600735624
  29. Majedi, M. (2016). Investigating the relationship between underlying variables, social capital and quality of life satisfaction in rural areas of Fars province. Hoviat Shahr, (9), 91–135. [In Persian]
  30. Mamirkulova, G., Mi, J., Abbas, J., Mahmood, S., Mubeen, R., & Ziapour, A. (2020). New Silk Road infrastructure opportunities in developing tourism environment for residents’ better quality of life. Global Ecology and Conservation, 24, Article e01194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gecco.2020.e01194
  31. Mao, Z., & Wang, D. (2020). Residential relocation and life satisfaction change: Is there difference between household couples?. Cities, 97, Article 102565. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2019.102565
  32. Mihalic, T. (2026). Progress in overtourism discourse measured through the well-being-centred sustainable tourism paradigm. In R. W. Butler & R. Dodds (Eds.), A research agenda for overtourism: Origins, problems, resolutions (pp. 33–48). Edward Elgar Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781035355341.00012
  33. Mohamed, A. S., & Mohamed, M. S. (2025). The impact of tourism development on urban spaces: A comprehensive approach to sustainable urban development. International Journal of Engineering and Applied Science, 2(1), 126–135. https://doi.org/10.21608/ijeasou.2025.338902.1003
  34. Nange, R. Y., & Ozturen, A. (2022). Urban decentralization and quality of life: Insights of tourism sector stakeholders in Cameroon.  International Journal of Research-granthaalayah, 10 (9), 153–172. https://doi.org/10.29121/granthaalayah.v10.i9.2022.4737
  35. Naroei, B., Barghjelveh, S., Esmaeilzadeh, H., & Zebardast, L. (2022). Evaluating spatial-temporal changes of urban green infrastructure using decision tree algorithm of spatial processes - Case study: Tehran Landscape System.  Scientific- Research Quarterly of Geographical Data (SEPEHR), 31(122), 167–188. https://doi.org/10.22131/sepehr.2022.254788[In Persian]
  36. Nunkoo, R., & So, K. K. F. (2016). Residents’ support for tourism: Testing alternative structural models. Journal of Travel Research, 55(7), 847–861. https://doi.org/10.1177/0047287515592972
  37. Pinto da Silva, J., Brando, A., & Sousa, C. (2019). Urban tourism pressures and community welfare. Cities, 94, 184–195. https://doi.org/10.33776/et.v9i2.3631
  38. Rahnamayi, M. T., Maleknia, M., & Jahaniyan, M. (2011). The role of cultural and historical axes of District 12 in the development of urban tourism in Tehran [Master's thesis, Payame Noor University, Tehran Province]. Ministry of Science, Research, and Technology. [In Persian]
  39. Ranjbar, E., Ayatollahi Tabatabaei, Z. S., & keshishians, A. (2023). Towards a comprehensive process of public spaces quality assessment in Iranian cities. Urban Design Discourse, 4(1), 115–134. [In Persian]
  40. Sampaio, C., Sebastião, J. R., & Farinha, L. (2024). Hospitality and tourism demand: Exploring industry shifts, themes, and trends. Societies, 14(10), Article 207. https://doi.org/10.3390/soc14100207
  41. Sarpong, S. Y., Bein, M. A., Gyamfi, B. A., & Sarkodie, S. A. (2020). The impact of tourism arrivals, tourism receipts and renewable energy consumption on quality of life: A panel study of Southern African region. Heliyon, 6(11), Article e05351. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e05351
  42. Serag El Din, H., Shalaby, A., Farouh, H. E., & Elariane, S. A. (2013). Principles of urban quality of life for a neighborhood. HBRC Journal, 9(1), 86–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hbrcj.2013.02.007
  43. Shahraki, S. Z., Hosseini, A., Sauri, D., & Hussaini, F. (2020). Fringe more than context: Perceived quality of life in informal settlements in a developing country: The case of Kabul, Afghanistan. Sustainable Cities and Society, 63, Article 102494. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2020.102494
  44. Shakib, H., Shams, M., & Malekhoseini, A. (1404 [2025 or 2026]). Urban tourism and sustainable urban development: A case study of Alashtar City. Manifestation of Art in Architecture and Urban Engineering, 3(2), 1–26. [In Persian]
  45. Steber, J., & Mayer, M. (2024). Challenges in managing urban tourism growth. Tourism Planning & Development, 21(1), 1–19.
  46. Türkcan, B. (2024). Sustainable urban tourism from the perspectives of overtourism and smart tourism: A systematic literature review. Journal of Travel and Tourism Research, 25, 112–156.
  47. Turker, N., Kocoglu, C. M., & Sarac, O. (2024). Effect of overtourism on residents' quality of life in world heritage cities. Journal of New Tourism Trends (JOINNTT), 5(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.58768/joinntt.1436906
  48. Tuzel, F., & Pirselimoglu Batman, Z. (2025). User satisfaction-based landscape planning in historical city centers: Bursa–Turkey. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 12, Article 1589. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-025-05967-6
  49. Zhang, X., & Ren, X. (2024). Design dilemma between urban tourism and quality of life: Assessment of livability barriers in different contexts. Sustainability, 16(12), Article 4897. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16124897
  50. Zou, W., Li, J., & Shu, Z. (2022). Urban quality of life and production amenity in Chinese cities. Sustainability, 14(4), Article 2434. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14042434