توسعه فیزیکی شهر مرودشت و نقش کارخانه قند در شکل گیری و روند توسعه آن

نوع مقاله : علمی - پژوهشی

نویسندگان

گروه جغرافیا، دانشکده علوم انسانی، دانشگاه شهید باهنر، کرمان، ایران

10.22098/gsd.2025.17148.1083

چکیده

شهر مرودشت به‌عنوان شهری با هویت صنعتی، شکل‌گیری و توسعه خود را مدیون فعالیت کارخانه قند است. این کارخانه با تأثیرگذاری بر تحولات فضایی، اجتماعی و اقتصادی، به نمادی تاریخی-فرهنگی و محور هویت شهری تبدیل‌شده است. پژوهش حاضر به تحلیل نقش تاریخی کارخانه قند در روند توسعه شهر مرودشت، تأثیر آن بر شهرنشینی، توسعه زیرساخت‌ها و تغییرات اجتماعی-اقتصادی می‌پردازد. این مطالعه با روش ترکیبی (تاریخی، کیفی و تحلیل فضایی) و استفاده از داده‌های اسنادی، مصاحبه‌های میدانی با ۲۵ ساکن قدیمی و تحلیل تصاویر ماهواره‌ای سنتینل 2 و گوگل ارث پرو (۱۹۸۵–۲۰۲۵)، در نرم‌افزار ArcGIS انجام شد.کارخانه قند به‌عنوان هسته اولیه، الگوی گسترش خطی و افقی شهر را شکل داد. مساحت شهر از ۹۶ هکتار (۱۳۱۴) به ۱٬۹۷۰ هکتار و جمعیت از ۸٬۹۸۷ نفر (۱۳۳۵) به ۱۴۸٬۸۵۸ نفر (۱۳۹۵) افزایش یافت. ایجاد محله‌های کارگری (فردوسی، فرهنگ)، توسعه زیرساخت‌ها (مدارس، شبکه آب و برق) و تقویت هویت جمعی از دستاوردهای این کارخانه بود. مصاحبه‌ها نشان می‌دهد کارخانه قند به‌عنوان «قلب تپنده شهر»، در خاطره ساکنان نقش بسته است.کارخانه قند مرودشت نقشی فراتر از یک بنگاه اقتصادی داشته و به عنصری کلیدی در شکل‌گیری هویت تاریخی، توسعه پایدار و خاطره جمعی تبدیل‌شده است. حفظ این میراث صنعتی و ادغام آن در برنامه‌ریزی شهری، به تقویت هویت و پویایی شهر کمک می‌کند. توسعه مرودشت حاصل تعامل پیچیده عوامل صنعتی (کارخانه قند)، جغرافیایی (هم‌جواری با تخت جمشید) و اقتصادی (رونق کشاورزی) بوده است

کلیدواژه‌ها


عنوان مقاله [English]

Physical Development of Marvdasht and the Role of the Sugar Factory in its Formation and Development Process

نویسندگان [English]

  • Masoud Ahmadi
  • hosein ghazanfarpour
  • behnam moghani rahimi
Department of Humanities, Faculty of Shahid Bahonar University, Kerman, Iran
چکیده [English]

A B S T R A C T
The city of Marvdasht, as an industrial-identity city, owes its formation and development to the activities of the sugar factory. Influencing spatial, social, and economic transformations, the factory has become a historical-cultural symbol and a cornerstone of urban identity. This study aims to analyze the historical role of the sugar factory in Marvdasht’s urban development, its impact on urbanization, infrastructure development, and socio-economic changes. Employing a mixed-method approach (historical, qualitative, and spatial analysis), this research utilizes archival data, field interviews with 25 long-term residents, and Sentinel-2 and Google Earth Pro satellite imagery (1985–2025) analyzed through ArcGIS software.The sugar factory acted as the initial core, shaping the city’s linear and horizontal expansion patterns. The urban area expanded from 96 hectares (1935) to 1,970 hectares (2023), while the population grew from 8,987 (1956) to 148,858 (2016). Key outcomes include the establishment of worker neighborhoods (e.g., Ferdowsi, Farhang), infrastructure development (schools, water and electricity networks), and the reinforcement of collective identity. Interviews reveal the factory’s enduring presence as the "beating heart of the city" in residents’ collective memory. The Marvdasht sugar factory transcended its economic role, emerging as a pivotal element in shaping historical identity, sustainable development, and collective memory. Preserving this industrial heritage and integrating it into urban planning can strengthen the city’s identity and dynamism. Marvdasht’s development stems from the complex interplay of industrial (sugar factory), geographical (proximity to Persepolis), and economic (agricultural prosperity) factors.
Extended Abstract
Introduction
Urbanization and sustainable development challenges are central to global agendas, as highlighted in the UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). Industrial activities, despite environmental concerns, remain pivotal in shaping cities, particularly in developing regions. Marvdasht, an industrial city in southern Iran, exemplifies this dynamic. Its development has been profoundly influenced by the Marvdasht Sugar Factory, established in 1935. This factory has not only driven economic growth but also shaped the city’s spatial, demographic, and socio-cultural identity. This study investigates the historical role of the sugar factory in Marvdasht’s urban development, focusing on its impact on spatial structure, infrastructure, and socio-economic transformations.
 
Methodology
This research employs a mixed-methods approach, integrating historical analysis, qualitative fieldwork, and spatial mapping using GIS. Archival records, municipal reports, and satellite imagery (1985–2025) were analyzed to trace urban expansion. Semi-structured interviews with 25 elderly residents provided insights into the factory’s socio-cultural impact. Spatial data from historical maps and satellite images (Google Earth Pro, Sentinel-2 L2A) were processed in ArcGIS to visualize growth patterns across six historical periods. Quantitative data, including census reports (1956–2016) and municipal plans, were used to map demographic and infrastructural changes. Thematic analysis of interviews identified recurring narratives related to identity, labor, and urban transformation.
 
Results and discussion
The sugar factory emerged as the nucleus of Marvdasht’s urbanization. Its establishment in 1935 triggered rapid population influx, with the city’s population growing from 8,987 (1956) to 148,858 (2016). Urban expansion followed a radial pattern, radiating northward and westward around the factory, forming neighborhoods like the Workers’ District. The city’s area grew from 96.3 hectares (pre-factory era) to 1,978.9 hectares (2020s), driven by industrial demand and migrant labor. Economically, the factory generated over 2,000 direct jobs and spurred ancillary industries (e.g., packaging, transport), contributing to 40% of the city’s GDP by the 1970s.
Socially, the factory fostered a cohesive identity among residents. Interviews revealed that 80% of participants associated the factory with "pride" and "collective memory," citing its iconic chimney and annual labor festivals as cultural symbols. Spatial analysis showed that 65% of residential areas developed within a 2 km radius of the factory, reinforcing its centrality. However, post-2000 deindustrialization led to urban sprawl, with new neighborhoods expanding into agricultural land, raising sustainability concerns.
The findings align with global studies on industrial heritage (Guitart, 2022; Bole et al., 2022), emphasizing the duality of factories as economic engines and cultural landmarks. Marvdasht’s spatial patterns reflect Christaller’s central place theory, with the factory serving as a service hub for 53 surrounding villages. Comparative analysis with Zonguldak, Turkey (Gündoğdu & Fidan, 2022), highlights shared challenges in balancing industrial decline with heritage preservation.
 
Conclusion
The Marvdasht Sugar Factory has been instrumental in transforming a rural-agrarian landscape into a thriving industrial city. Its influence extends beyond economics, embedding itself in the city’s historical and cultural fabric. However, unchecked post-industrial sprawl threatens ecological balance and cultural continuity. To address this, the study proposes three strategies:
Adaptive reuse: Convert factory sites into cultural centers or museums to preserve heritage. For instance, repurposing the factory’s machinery halls as art galleries or community workshops could mirror successful models like the Tate Modern in London or the Zeche Zollverein in Germany, blending history with contemporary utility.
Industrial tourism: Develop guided tours highlighting the factory’s role in Iran’s industrialization. Collaborations with schools and historians could create educational trails, while augmented reality (AR) apps might overlay historical footage onto current structures, enhancing visitor engagement.
Green infrastructure: Integrate abandoned industrial zones into urban green corridors. Planting native species like Persian oak or establishing urban farms could mitigate heat islands, while pedestrian pathways would reconnect fragmented neighborhoods, fostering social cohesion.
These measures could reconcile growth with sustainability, offering a model for post-industrial cities globally. Further research should explore the role of digital tools (e.g., VR) in revitalizing industrial memory—such as virtual reconstructions of the factory’s operational peak—and compare Marvdasht’s trajectory with similar cities in Asia (e.g., Ahmedabad’s textile mills) and Africa (e.g., Johannesburg’s mining landscapes). Additionally, partnerships with NGOs and local stakeholders could ensure inclusive planning, prioritizing marginalized communities affected by deindustrialization. By intertwining preservation, innovation, and ecology, Marvdasht can redefine its identity while honoring its industrial legacy.
 
Funding
There is no funding support.
 
Authors’ Contribution
Authors contributed equally to the conceptualization and writing of the article. All of the authors approved thecontent of the manuscript and agreed on all aspects of the work declaration of competing interest none.
 
Conflict of Interest
Authors declared no conflict of interest.
 
Acknowledgments
 We are grateful to all the scientific consultants of this paper.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Sugar factory
  • Marvdasht
  • Industrial heritage
  • Urban development
  1. مهندسین مشاور آمایش و محیط. (1375). طرح تفصیلی شهر مرودشت.
  2. مهندسین مشاور امکو. (1356). طرح جامع شهر مرودشت.
  3. مهندسین مشاور پارهاس و همکاران. (1371). طرح جامع مرودشت (جلد دوم و سوم).
  4. سازمان جغرافیایی کشور. (1330). فرهنگ جغرافیایی ایران (آبادی‌ها). (جلد 7، ص. 220).
  5. شیخی، محمد. (1371). الگوی نظام شهری مورد استان فارس. (پایان‌نامه کارشناسی ارشد، دانشگاه تهران، ص. 284).
  6. نیبور، کارستن. (1354). سفرنامه کارستن نیبور. (ترجمه پرویز رجبی). چاپ اول.
  7. صارمی، محمود. (1374). پیکرشناختی شهر مرودشت در سه دهه اخیر. (پایان‌نامه کارشناسی ارشد، دانشگاه شهید بهشتی).
  8. سازمان برنامه‌ و بودجه. (1370). ویژگی‌های اقتصادی و اجتماعی عشایر کوچنده فارس: کاوشی در انگیزه‌های اسکان. مجموعه مقالات اجتماعی، شماره 6، تابستان 1370.
  9. رفیعی، قاسم. (1387). بررسی و تحلیل روند و الگوی گسترش کالبدی فضایی شهر مرودشت و بهینه‌گزینی جهات گسترش آتی آن با استفاده از GIS. (پایان‌نامه کارشناسی ارشد، دانشگاه سیستان و بلوچستان).
  10. حسامیان، فرخ و حائری، محمدرضا. (1388). شهرنشینی در ایران. تهران: نشر آگاه.
  11. آربری، آرتور جان (اچ. آربری). (1353). شیراز: مهد شعر و عرفان. (ترجمه منوچهر کاشف).
  12. مجیدزاده، یوسف. (1367). آغاز شهرنشینی در ایران. تهران: آگاه.
  13. آتشین‌بار، محمد. (1388). تداوم هویت در منظر شهری. باغ نظر، (12)، 12-1.
  14. رنجکش، ریحانه و فدائی‌نژاد بهرامجردی، سمیه. (1398). انطباق‌پذیری و استفاده مجدد از میراث صنعتی به‌مثابه تداوم هویت شهری؛ کارخانه سالامبورسازی تبریز و کارخانه چرم‌سازی ایگوالادا اسپانیا. نقش جهان: فصلنامه معماری و شهرسازی اسلامی، 10(1)، 33-19.
  15. رفعتی، مرجان و حقیقت‌بین، مهدی. (1394). بررسی نقش هویت و خاطرات جمعی در باززنده‌سازی منظر صنعتی متروکه شهرها. در سومین کنگره بین‌المللی عمران، معماری و توسعه شهری.
  16. رضایی منصورآباد، امیرحسین و هاشمی، احمدرضا. (1402). کهن دشت مرودشت. تهران: انتشارات صحرایی سبز.
  17. Arberry, Arthur J. (1974). Shiraz: Mahd-e sher va ‘erfan [Shiraz: Cradle of poetry and mysticism] (M. Kashef, Trans.). [Publisher not specified]. [in persian].
  18.   Atashinbar, M. (2009). Tadavom-e hoviat dar manzar-e shahri [Continuity of identity in urban landscape]. Bagh-e Nazar, 12, 1–12. [in persian].
  19. Bole, D., Kumer, P., Gašperič, P., Kozina, J., Pipan, P., & Tiran, J. (2022). Clash of Two Identities: What Happens to Industrial Identity in a Post-Industrial Society. Societies, 12(2), 49. https://doi.org/10.3390/soc12020049
  20. Desrochers, P. (2000). Market processes and the closing of industrial loops: A historical reappraisal. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 4(1), 29–4https://doi.org/10.1162/108819800569176
  21. Guitart, M. (2022). Preserving identities in post-industrial Rust Belt cities: reconsidering Buffalo’s material memory.  City, Territory and Architecture, 9(12). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40410-022-00158-1
  22. Gündoğdu, S., & Fidan, F. (2022). The Effect of Industrial Landscape on the Urban Identity in Zonguldak. Planlama, 32(3), 424–441. https://doi.org/10.14744/planlama.2022.78055
  23. Hägerstrand, T. (1967). Innovation diffusion as a spatial process. University of Chicago Press.
  24. Herrmann, C., Juraschek, M., Kara, S., & Thiede, S. (2019). Urban factories: Identifying products for production in cities.  In Proceedings of the International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Operations Management (pp. 185-198). Springer.
  25. Hessamian, F., & Haeri, M. (2009). Shahrneshini dar Iran. [Urbanization in Iran]. Tehran: Nashr-e Agah. [in persian].
  26. Juraschek, M., Bucherer, M., Schnabel, F., Hoffschröer, H., Vossen, B., Kreuz, F., Thiede, S., & Herrmann, C. (2018). Urban factories and their potential contribution to the sustainable development of cities. Procedia CIRP, 69, 72–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2017.11.067
  27. Lagerqvist, B. (2010). The production of industrial heritage and the heritage in industrial production. In Reusing the Industrial Past Conference (pp. 1–12). Tampere University Press.
  28. Lefebvre, H. (1991). The production of space. (D. Nicholson-Smith, Trans.).\ Blackwell.
  29. López, G. A. (2019). Las ciudades medias industriales en España. Evolución histórica, proceso de urbanización y estructura urbana / The industrial medium size cities in Spain. Historical evolution, urbanization process and urban structure. Universidad de Oviedo, 1(1), 25-49. https://www.doi.org/10.17811/ER.1.2019.25-49
  30. Lynch, K. (1960). The image of the city. MIT Press.
  31.   Majidzadeh, Y. (1988). Aghaz-e shahrneshini dar Iran. [Beginning of urbanization in Iran]. Tehran: Agah. [in persian].
  32. Mohandesin-e Moshaver-e Amayesh va Mohit. (1996). Tarh-e tafsili-ye shahr-e Marvdasht [Detailed plan of Marvdasht city]. [in persian].
  33.   Mohandesin-e Moshaver-e EMCO. (1977). Tarh-e jame‘-e shahr-e Marvdasht. [Master plan of Marvdasht city]. [Publisher not specified]. [in persian].
  34. Mohandesin-e Moshaver-e Parhas va Hamkaran. (1992). Tarh-e jame‘-e Marvdasht (Vols. 2–3). [Master plan of Marvdasht]. [Publisher not specified]. [in persian].
  35.   Niebuhr, C. (1975). Safarname-ye Carsten Niebuhr. [Travelogue of Carsten Niebuhr] (P. Rajabi, Trans.). First Edition. [Publisher not specified]. [in persian].
  36.  Open Journal of Social Sciences, 5, 148-168. https://doi.org/10.4236/jss.2017.510014
  37.   Rafati, M, & Haghighatbin, M. (2015). Barrasi-ye naghshe-ye hoviat va khaterat-e jam‘i dar bazzendeh-sazi-ye manzar-e san’ati-ye matroukeh-ye shahrha [The role of identity and collective memory in regeneration of abandoned industrial landscapes]. In 3rd International Congress on Civil Engineering, Architecture and Urban Development. [Location not specified]. [in persian].
  38.   Rafiei, Gh. (2008). Barrasi va tahlil-e ravand va olgu-ye gostarsh-e kalbadi-fazayi-ye shahr-e Marvdasht va behine-gazini-ye jahat-ha-ye gostarsh-e ati ba estefadeh az GIS [Analysis of spatial expansion patterns of Marvdasht using GIS]. (Master’s thesis, University of Sistan and Baluchestan). [in persian].
  39.   Ranjkesh, Reyhaneh, & Fadaeinezhad Bahramjordi, Somayeh. (2019). Entabagh-paziri va estefadeh-ye mojaddad az miras-e san’ati be-masabeh-ye tadavom-e hoviat-e shahri: Karkhaneh-ye salamoursazi-ye Tabriz va karkhaneh-ye charm-sazi-ye Igualada Espanya [Adaptation and reuse of industrial heritage as urban identity continuity: Tabriz and Igualada factories]. Naghsh-e Jahan: Scientific Journal of Islamic Architecture and Urbanism, 10(1), 19–33. [in persian].
  40.   Rezaei Mansourabad, A., & Hashemi, A. (2023). Kohan Dasht-e Marvdasht [The ancient plain of Marvdasht]. Tehran: Sahraei Sabz Publications. [in persian].
  41. Rezende, R. (2024). Industrial heritage, identity, and memory: the case of the Ruhr Valley. open Journal of Social Sciences, 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1590/2236-9996.2025-6265884.en
  42. Saremi, M. (1995). Peykarshenakhti-ye shahr-e Marvdasht dar se dahe-ye akhir [Morphological study of Marvdasht city in recent three decades]. (Master’s thesis, Shahid Beheshti University). [in persian].
  43.   Sazman-e Barnameh va Boodjeh. (1991). Vijeghi-ha-ye eqtesadi va ejtemai-ye ‘ashayer-e kuchande-ye Fars: Kavoshi dar angize-ha-ye eskan [Socioeconomic characteristics of nomads of Fars; study of settlement motivations]. Majmo‘eh-ye Maqalat-e Ejtemai, 6(Summer), [Pages not specified]. [in persian].
  44.   Sazman-e Joghrafiya-ye Keshvar. (1951). Farhang-e joghrafiya-ye Iran (Abadiha) [Geographical dictionary of Iran – settlements] (Vol. 7, p. 220). [Publisher not specified]. [in persian].
  45. Sheikhi, M. (1992). Olgu-ye nezam-e shahri-ye mored-e ostan-e Fars [Urban system model of Fars Province]. (Master’s thesis, University of Tehran, p. 284). [in persian].
  46. Yan, S. Q. (2017). The effect of the characteristics of industrial clusters on population urbanization: A case study of the poplar industrial cluster in North Jiangsu Province of China.