نقش توسعه زیرساخت‌های حمل‌ونقل در کاهش نابرابری فضایی در مناطق مرزی مکران

نوع مقاله : علمی - پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 گروه جامعه‌شناسی، واحد علوم تحقیقات، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، تهران، ایران

2 گروه جامعه‌شناسی، دانشکده علوم اجتماعی، دانشگاه تهران، تهران، ایران

3 گروه برنامه‌ریزی اجتماعی، دانشکده علوم اجتماعی، دانشگاه تهران، تهران، ایران

4 گروه مهاجرت و شهرنشینی، موسسه تحقیقات جمعیت کشور، تهران، ایران

چکیده

منطقه مکران به عنوان یکی از پهنه‌های راهبردی جنوب شرق ایران، به دلیل موقعیت ژئوپلیتیکی، دسترسی مستقیم به آب‌های آزاد و ظرفیت‌های متنوع اقتصادی، همواره در اسناد توسعه‌ای ملی و منطقه‌ای موردتوجه بوده است. با این حال، ضعف زیرساخت‌های حمل‌ونقل، پراکندگی خدمات و محدودیت‌های ارتباطی، زمینه تشدید نابرابری‌های فضایی و کندی فرایند توسعه یکپارچه و پایدار را در این منطقه فراهم کرده است. ازاین‌رو، هدف پژوهش حاضر تبیین نقش توسعه زیرساخت‌های حمل‌ونقل در بهبود عدالت فضایی، کاهش شکاف‌های منطقه‌ای و تقویت انسجام سرزمینی در مکران است. این پژوهش با رویکرد کیفی و با بهره‌گیری از راهبرد نظریه داده بنیاد انجام شد. داده‌ها از طریق مصاحبه‌های نیمه ساختاریافته گردآوری شد و نمونه‌گیری به صورت هدفمند و سپس نظری صورت گرفت. فرایند گردآوری داده‌ها تا اشباع نظری ادامه یافت و پس از انجام ۲۰ مصاحبه، شامل ۱۲ متخصص و ۸ فعال محلی، مفهوم تازه‌ای حاصل نشد. یافته‌ها نشان داد که توسعه زیرساخت‌های حمل‌ونقل در مکران، افزون بر کارکرد ارتباطی، آثار اقتصادی و اجتماعی گسترده‌ای همچون ارتقای دسترسی، کاهش هزینه‌های جابه‌جایی، تسهیل جریان کالا و خدمات و افزایش جذابیت منطقه برای سرمایه‌گذاری دارد. همچنین، این تحول می‌تواند پیوندهای کارکردی میان سکونتگاه‌های شهری و روستایی را تقویت کرده، گسست فضایی را کاهش دهد و تاب‌آوری جمعیت محلی را افزایش دهد. در مجموع، نتایج پژوهش بیانگر آن است که توسعه هدفمند و متوازن زیرساخت‌های حمل‌ونقل، در صورت همراهی با سازوکارهای نهادی و مدیریتی مناسب، می‌تواند به عنوان محرکی مؤثر در کاهش نابرابری فضایی و تثبیت جایگاه مکران در شبکه توسعه ملی و فراملی عمل کند.

کلیدواژه‌ها


عنوان مقاله [English]

The Role of Transportation Infrastructure Development in Reducing Spatial Inequality in the Makran Border Region

نویسندگان [English]

  • Khan Mohammad Askani 1
  • Mostafa Azkia 2
  • Meysam Moussaei 3
  • Valiollah Rostamalizadeh 4
1 Department of Sociology, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran
2 Department of Sociology, Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran
3 Department of Social Planning, Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran
4 Department of Migration and Urbanization, National Institute for Population Research, Tehran, Iran
چکیده [English]

A B S T R A C T
The Makran region, as a strategic zone in southeastern Iran, has consistently been highlighted in national and regional development documents due to its geopolitical position, direct access to open waters, and diverse economic potentials. However, weaknesses in transportation infrastructure, dispersed services, and limited connectivity have intensified spatial inequalities and hindered integrated and sustainable development in the region. Accordingly, the present study aims to explain the role of transportation infrastructure development in enhancing spatial justice, reducing regional disparities, and strengthening territorial cohesion in Makran. This research employed a qualitative approach using the grounded theory strategy. Data were collected through semi-structured interviews, and sampling was conducted purposively and then theoretically. The data collection process continued until theoretical saturation reached, and after conducting 20 interviews including 12 experts and 8 local actors no new conceptual insights emerged. The findings indicate that transportation infrastructure development in Makran, beyond its functional role in connectivity, generates wide-ranging economic and social implications such as improved accessibility, reduced transportation costs, facilitation of goods and service flows, and increased the capacity of the region for investment. Moreover, such development can enhance functional linkages between urban and rural settlements, decline spatial fragmentation, and augment local community resilience. Overall, the results demonstrate that targeted and balanced development of transportation infrastructure if supported by appropriate institutional and governance mechanisms can serve as an effective driver in reducing spatial inequalities and reinforcing Makran’s position within national and transnational development networks.
Extended Abstract
Introduction
The Makran border region in southeastern Iran occupies a highly strategic position within the national and regional spatial system. Due to its direct access to open waters, proximity to international trade routes, and significant economic and geopolitical potentials, this region has repeatedly been emphasized in development policies and territorial planning documents. Nevertheless, Makran continues to suffer from persistent spatial inequality, uneven service distribution, weak inter-settlement connectivity, and restricted integration into broader economic and infrastructural networks. One of the principal factors underlying this condition is the inadequacy of transportation infrastructure, which has constrained mobility, raised transaction and logistics costs, weakened functional linkages among settlements, and slowed the process of balanced regional development.
Transportation infrastructure, from a spatial justice perspective, is not simply a technical subsystem of development; rather, it is a fundamental determinant of access, opportunity, territorial cohesion, and the equitable distribution of development benefits. In border regions such as Makran, where distance, remoteness, institutional fragmentation, and uneven state presence intersect, transportation networks play a decisive role in shaping patterns of inclusion and exclusion. Accordingly, understanding how infrastructure development may contribute to reducing spatial inequality is essential for designing more effective regional development strategies. The study seeks to explain the role of transportation infrastructure development in mitigating spatial inequality and promoting territorial integration in the Makran border region.
 
Methodology
This study is applied in terms of purpose and descriptive-analytical in terms of nature, which adopted a qualitative approach. Data were accumulated utilizing documentary and field methods. The documentation section included a review of national and regional development programs, land management documents, reports of the Ports and Maritime Organization, and previous academic studies. The field section was conducted through semi-structured interviews with space planning experts, regional managers, transportation informants and faculty members familiar with the development dynamics of Makran region. Participants were selected initially through purposive sampling and later through theoretical sampling, until theoretical saturation was reached. In total, 20 interviews were conducted, comprising 12 experts and 8 local actors.
The data analysis process followed the systematic procedures of grounded theory, including open coding, axial coding, and selective coding. During open coding, the interview transcripts were broken down into discrete conceptual units. These units were then organized into broader categories during axial coding by identifying relationships among causal conditions, contextual factors, intervening conditions, strategies, and outcomes. Finally, selective coding was used to integrate the categories into a coherent theoretical model explaining the role of transportation infrastructure in reducing spatial inequality. This methodological design allowed the study to move beyond surface-level descriptions and produce an interpretive model rooted in empirical evidence.
 
Results and Discussion
The findings demonstrate that transportation infrastructure development in Makran has multidimensional and far-reaching implications. Initially, it improves physical accessibility across the region and between Makran and larger national and transnational networks. Second, it reduces the cost and time of movement for people, goods, and services, thereby enhancing economic efficiency and expanding the spatial reach of markets. Third, it increases the capacity of the region for public and private investment by declining uncertainty and improving logistical reliability. Fourth, it strengthens functional relations between urban and rural settlements, helping to reduce the socio-spatial divide that has long characterized border areas. Fifth, it contributes to greater resilience among local populations by improving access to health, education, administrative, and commercial services.
At the same time, the findings reveal that spatial inequality in Makran is produced through a combination of structural, institutional, and managerial conditions. Deficient communication infrastructure, inadequate transport connectivity, long geographic distances, poor coordination among institutions, bureaucratic complexity, low managerial capacity, and limited investment resources were identified as major factors reinforcing inequality. These conditions indicate that the problem is not reducible to physical infrastructure deficits alone. Rather, spatial inequality emerges through the interaction of material underdevelopment and governance-related constraints. Therefore, infrastructure development should be understood as part of a broader institutional and territorial transformation process.
The analysis suggests that transportation infrastructure can function as a catalyst for regional integration only when it is embedded in a coherent policy environment. Infrastructure projects that are implemented without institutional coordination, participatory governance, or alignment with local needs may fail to generate meaningful reductions in spatial inequality. In contrast, strategically planned transport investment can reshape settlement hierarchies, improve access to opportunity, and create more balanced relations between the center and the periphery.
From a theoretical standpoint, the study underscores that spatial inequality should be conceptualized not merely as a gap in physical provision, but as a multidimensional outcome of uneven power relations, administrative centralization, historical neglect, and territorial marginalization. Transport infrastructure, in border regions such as Makran, has the potential to reduce this inequality by enabling connectivity, circulation, and accessibility. However, this potential can only be realized if development policies address the institutional and governance barriers that mediate infrastructure outcomes. Thus, the study supports a justice-oriented view of regional development in which infrastructure is treated as an instrument of territorial equity rather than as an isolated engineering intervention.
 
Conclusion
The study concludes that the reduction of spatial inequality in the Makran border region requires an integrated and justice-based approach to transportation infrastructure development. Infrastructure can play a transformative role in improving accessibility, strengthening territorial cohesion, facilitating economic activity, and connecting marginalized settlements to wider development circuits. Yet its effectiveness depends on institutional coordination, administrative efficiency, and development strategies that recognize the social and spatial specificities of the border region.
In practical terms, the findings indicate that Makran’s transition from spatial fragmentation toward balanced development will require more than road construction or logistical expansion. It will require a comprehensive framework that links infrastructure investment to governance reform, regional planning, and spatial justice principles. When such a framework is in place, transportation infrastructure can serve as a powerful mechanism for reducing inequality, enhancing regional resilience, and reinforcing Makran’s role in national and transnational development networks.
 
Funding
There is no funding support.
 
Authors’ Contribution
The first author was responsible for conceptualization, methodology design, data collection and analysis, drafting the manuscript, and final editing. The second and third authors contributed to supervising the research implementation, validating the findings, critically revising the article's content, and approving the final version. The fourth author contributed to developing the theoretical framework and structural editing, as well as formulating the analysis, discussion, and conclusion sections..
 
Conflict of Interest
Authors declared no conflict of interest.
 
Acknowledgments
We are grateful to all the scientific consultants of this paper.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Keywords:Transportation Infrastructure Development
  • Spatial Inequality
  • Spatial Justice
  • Makran Border Region
  • Regional Development
  1. ازکیا، مصطفی و ایمانی جاجرمی، حسین. (۱۳۹۰). روش تحقیق کیفی؛ رویکردی به پژوهش در رفتار انسانی. تهران: انتشارات اطلاعات.
  2. استراوس، آنسلم و کوربین، جولیت. (۱۳۷۷). پایه‌های نظریه داده بنیاد: روش‌ها، رویه‌ها و تکنیک‌ها (ترجمه باقر ساروخانی و محمدرضا فاضلی). تهران: پژوهشگاه علوم انسانی و مطالعات فرهنگی.
  3. اعتمادی، کیانا؛ صرافی، مظفر و ندایی طوسی، سحر. (۱۳۹۸). توسعه منطقه ساحلی مکران در پرتو منطقه آزاد تجاری - صنعتی چابهار. فصلنامه برنامه‌ریزی توسعه شهری و منطقه‌ای، ۴ (۸)، 34-1. https://doi.org/10.22054/urdp.2021.55996.1255
  4. خزائی، عباس؛ یوسفی، همایون و دلبر، غلامرضا. (۱۳۹۷). شناسایی و بررسی دالان‌های بین‌المللی حمل‌ونقل کالا به کشورهای هم‌جوار و تأثیر آن‌ها بر امنیت ملی کشور. نشریه صنعت حمل‌ونقل دریایی، ۴ (۱)، ۶۷-۷۷.
  5. خیرالدین، رضا و رازپور، مهدی. (۱۳۹۷). پایش تحولات فضایی سکونتگاه‌های روستایی مناطق مرزی؛ چالش‌ها و ظرفیت‌ها در کارکرد جامعه روستایی شهرستان مرزی بانه. روستا و توسعه، 17(4)، 48-25. doi: 10.30490/rvt.2018.59411
  6. رستمعلی‌زاده، ولی‌اله؛ نوبخت، رضا و کیانی، رضا. (۱۴۰۳). توسعه سرمایه‌گذاری و ماندگاری جمعیت در مناطق مرزی روستایی ایران. مطالعات توسعه اجتماعی ایران، ۱۶ (۴)، 120-105.
  7. زاهدی، محمدجواد. (۱۳۹۶). توسعه و نابرابری. تهران: انتشارات مازیار.
  8. زیاری، کرامت‌الله و قاسمی، سعید. (۱۴۰۳). تحلیلی بر تأثیر استفاده از فناوری‌های حمل‌ونقل هوشمند در حمل‌ونقل شهری کلان‌شهر تبریز. مجله جغرافیا و توسعه فضایی، ۱ (۴)، ۹۱–۱۰۷.
  9. شیخ بیگلو، رعنا؛ تقوایی، مسعود و وارثی، حمیدرضا. (۱۳۹۱). تحلیل فضایی محرومیت و نابرابری‌های توسعه در شهرستان‌های ایران. رفاه اجتماعی، ۱۲ (۴۶)، ۱۸۹-۲۱۴.
  10. مولایی قلیچی، محمد؛ زیاری، کرامت‌اله؛ نصرتی هشی، مرتضی و کاردگر، راضیه. (۱۳۹۷). اولویت‌بندی فضایی توسعه حمل‌ونقل جاده‌ای در استان‌های ایران با تأکید بر مدل تصمیم‌گیری WASPAS. دانش شهرسازی، ۲ (۱)، ۶۷-۸۱.
  11. وزارت راه و شهرسازی. (۱۳۹۹). گزارش جامع / سند توسعه سواحل مکران. تهران: وزارت راه و شهرسازی.
  12. ولی‌قلی‌زاده، علی. (۱۳۹۵). تحلیل فضایی تأثیرات تمرکزگرایی در شکل‌گیری نابرابری‌های فضایی- سرزمینی در ایران. فصلنامه پژوهش‌های جغرافیای سیاسی، ۱ (۴)، ۱۳۹-۱۶۸.
  13. Azkia, M., & Imani Jajarmi, H. (2011). Qualitative research method: An approach to research in human behavior. Tehran: Ettelaat Publications. [In Persian]
  14. Banerjee, A., Duflo, E., & Qian, N. (2020). On the road: Access to transportation infrastructure and economic growth in China. Journal of Development Economics, 145, 102442. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdeveco.2020.102442
  15. Banister, D., & Berechman, Y. (2001). Transport investment and the promotion of economic growth. Journal of Transport Geography, 9(3), 209–218. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0966-6923(01)00013-8
  16. Etemadi, K., Sarrafi, M., & Nadaei Tousi, S. (2019). Development of Makran coastal zone in the light of Chabahar Free Trade-Industrial Zone.  Journal of Urban and Regional Development Planning, 4(8), 1-34. https://doi.org/10.22054/urdp.2021.55996.1255 [In Persian]
  17. Fraser, N. (2008). Scales of justice: Reimagining political space in a globalizing world. New York: Columbia University Press.
  18. Friedmann, J. (1966). Regional development policy: A case study of Venezuela. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  19. Fujita, M., Krugman, P., & Venables, A. J. (1999). The spatial economy: Cities, regions and international trade. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  20. Harvey, D. (1973). Social justice and the city. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
  21. Harvey, D. (2009). Social justice and the city (Rev. ed.). Athens: University of Georgia Press.
  22. Hirschman, A. O. (1958). The strategy of economic development. New Haven: Yale University Press.
  23. Khazaei, A., Yousefi, H., & Delbar, G. (2018). Identification and investigation of international freight transport corridors to neighboring countries and their impact on national security. Journal of Maritime Transport Industry, 4(1), 67-77. [In Persian]
  24. Kheyruddin, R., & Razpour, M. (2018). Monitoring spatial changes of rural settlements in border areas: Challenges and capacities in the function of rural society in Baneh border county. Rural Development, 17(4), 25-48. https://doi.org/10.30490/rvt.2018.59411 [In Persian]
  25. Krugman, P. (1991). Increasing returns and economic geography. Journal of Political Economy, 99(3), 483–499. https://doi.org/10.1086/261763
  26. Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Beverly Hills: Sage.
  27. Ministry of Roads and Urban Development. (2020). [Comprehensive report / Development document of Makran coasts]. Ministry of Roads and Urban Development. [In Persian]
  28. Molaee Gholichi, M., Ziari, K., Nosrati Heshi, M., & Kardgar, R. (2018). Spatial prioritization of road transportation development in Iran's provinces with emphasis on WASPAS decision model. Journal of Urban Planning Knowledge, 2(1), 67-81. [In Persian]
  29. Myrdal, G. (1957). Economic theory and under-developed regions. London: Duckworth.
  30. Newman, D. (2019). Border and territory in the global era. London: Routledge.
  31. OECD. (2012). Redefining “urban”: A new way to measure metropolitan areas. Paris: OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264174108-en
  32. Rodrigue, J. P. (2020). The geography of transport systems (5th ed.). New York: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429346323
  33. Rostamalizadeh, V., Nobakht, R., & Kiani, R. (2024). Development of investment and population retention in rural border areas of Iran. Iranian Journal of Social Development Studies, 16(4), 105-120. [In Persian]
  34. Sheikh Biglou, R., Taghvaei, M., & Varesi, H. R. (2012). Spatial analysis of deprivation and development inequalities in Iran's counties. Social Welfare, 12(46), 189-214. [In Persian]
  35. Soja, E. W. (2010). Seeking spatial justice. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
  36. Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of grounded theory: Methods, procedures, and techniques. (B. Saroukhani & M. R. Fazeli, Trans.). Institute for Humanities and Cultural Studies. [In Persian]
  37. Valigholizadeh, A. (2016). Spatial analysis of the impacts of centralization on the formation of spatial-territorial inequalities in Iran.  Journal of Political Geography Research, 1(4), 139-168. [In Persian]
  38. Venables, A. J. (2007). Evaluating urban transport improvements. Journal of Transport Economics and Policy, 41(2), 173–188.
  39. World Bank. (2009). World development report 2009: Reshaping economic geography. Washington, DC: World Bank. https://doi.org/10.1596/978-0-8213-7607-2
  40. Zahedi, M. J. (2017). [Development and inequality]. Maziar Publications. [In Persian]
  41. Ziari, K., & Ghasemi, S. (2024). An analysis of the impact of using intelligent transportation technologies on urban transportation in Tabriz metropolis. Journal of Geography and Spatial Development, 1(4), 91-107. [In Persian]