Spatial Justice Analysis of Urban Green Space Distribution and Its Overlap with Carbon Monoxide Pollution in Neighborhoods of Tabriz Metropolis

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 Department of Urban and Regional Planning, and Director of the Environmental and Sustainable Urban Development Research Laboratory, University of Tabriz

2 Department of Urban and Regional Planning, Faculty of Planning and Environmental Sciences, University of Tabriz, Tabriz, Iran

Abstract

A B S T R A C T
The present study aims to analyze spatial inequality in the distribution of urban parks and its co-occurrence with CO pollution hotspots at the neighborhood level in the metropolis of Tabriz. The research data include the area of 238 urban parks, the population of 97 neighborhoods, the NDVI index derived from Sentinel-2 (2024), and the cumulative concentration of CO from Sentinel-5P (2019–2024). Data analysis was conducted using the Lorenz curve, the Gini coefficient calculated via the trapezoidal numerical integration method, global and local Moran's I statistics, and Lee's L-index spatial correlation index within ArcGIS Pro and Excel environments. The Gini coefficient for green space was calculated as 0/7066, indicating extreme inequality, while the Gini coefficient for population distribution was 0/1965, reflecting a relatively balanced dispersion. Only 10% of neighborhoods account for half of the total park area in the city. The spatial distribution pattern of both NDVI and CO indices was identified as clustered (global Moran's I values of 0/94 and 0/98, respectively, significant at the 0/01 level). Lee's L-index identified neighborhoods with "double deprivation" (low vegetation and high pollution – LH class) primarily in the central and densely built-up areas of the city (including Bazar, Valiasr, Monajjem, and Khatib). Northwestern neighborhoods (Gharamalek, Shahrak-e Emam, and the vicinity of the airport) fell into the HH category (high vegetation coupled with high pollution), while neighborhoods such as Roshdiyeh were classified as HL (high vegetation and low pollution – a desirable environmental condition). The results indicate that spatial justice in Tabriz faces a serious challenge, and a deep gap exists between population distribution and green space allocation. Central neighborhoods and deteriorated urban fabrics are identified as critical dual hotspots (deprived of green space and exposed to high pollution).
Extended Abstract
Introduction
Urban environmental justice has emerged as a critical concern in rapidly developing cities, especially in contexts where spatial inequality intersects with ecological vulnerability. In Iranian metropolises such as Tabriz, the uneven distribution of urban green space and disproportionate exposure to air pollutants like carbon monoxide (CO) reflect deep-rooted disparities in urban planning and resource allocation. Green spaces are not merely aesthetic or recreational assets; they serve as vital ecological infrastructures that regulate microclimates, absorb pollutants, and promote physical and mental well-being. However, when access to these spaces is skewed across neighborhoods, it raises pressing questions about spatial justice and the right to a healthy urban environment. This study investigates the spatial distribution of urban green space in Tabriz and examines its correlation with CO pollution levels across neighborhoods. By integrating remote sensing data, spatial statistical techniques, and inequality metrics, the research aims to identify patterns of environmental injustice and propose a replicable framework for urban equity analysis.
 
Methodology
The study adopts a multi-layered analytical approach combining geospatial analysis, statistical modeling, and environmental assessment. Data sources include: Population data from the latest national census, aggregated at the neighborhood level. Land-use maps identifying urban parks and green infrastructure. Sentinel-2 satellite imagery for calculating the Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI), a proxy for green space density. Sentinel-5P satellite data for measuring carbon monoxide (CO) concentrations as an indicator of urban air pollution.
To assess inequality in green space distribution, the Lorenz curve and Gini coefficient were employed. These metrics quantify the degree of concentration and disparity in green space allocation relative to population distribution. Spatial autocorrelation was analyzed using Global Moran’s I and Local Moran’s I, which detect clustering patterns and spatial outliers. Additionally, Lee’s L-index was used to examine the spatial association between NDVI and CO levels, offering insight into the co-location of vegetation and pollution. All spatial analyses were conducted in ArcGIS Pro, supplemented by statistical validation in R and Python environments to ensure reproducibility and robustness.
 
Results and Discussion
The results reveal stark disparities in the distribution of green space across Tabriz neighborhoods. Specifically:            Only 10% of neighborhoods account for over 50% of the city’s total green space, indicating a highly concentrated allocation. The Gini coefficient for green space was calculated at 0.7066, signifying severe inequality. In contrast, the Gini coefficient for population was 0.1965, suggesting a relatively balanced demographic spread. NDVI analysis showed that vegetation cover is clustered and uneven, with significant variation between peripheral and central districts. CO pollution data also exhibited spatial clustering, with elevated concentrations in densely populated central areas and industrial zones. Spatial correlation analysis using Lee’s L-index identified distinct zones of environmental injustice: HH zones (High NDVI, High CO) were found in the northwestern neighborhoods and areas near the airport, indicating green space presence but high pollution exposure—possibly due to traffic and industrial activity. LH zones (Low NDVI, High CO) were concentrated in central urban districts, where population density is high, vegetation is scarce, and pollution levels are elevated. These areas represent critical hotspots of spatial and environmental vulnerability.
The juxtaposition of green space scarcity and pollution exposure in central neighborhoods underscores a compounded form of environmental injustice. Residents in these areas not only lack access to ecological benefits but are also disproportionately burdened by health risks associated with air pollution. The findings challenge conventional urban planning paradigms that prioritize aesthetic greening in affluent districts while neglecting the ecological needs of marginalized communities. Moreover, the significant spatial association between NDVI and CO levels suggests that vegetation cover may play a role in modulating pollution concentrations. However, the presence of HH zones indicates that green space alone is insufficient to mitigate pollution in areas with high vehicular or industrial emissions. This calls for integrated urban strategies that combine ecological restoration with emission control and equitable resource distribution. The methodological framework—combining remote sensing, spatial statistics, and inequality metrics—demonstrates a scalable and adaptable approach for assessing spatial justice in other urban contexts. It also highlights the importance of using context-sensitive indicators that reflect local climatic, cultural, and infrastructural realities rather than relying solely on global benchmarks.
 
Conclusion
This study provides a comprehensive analysis of spatial justice in urban green space distribution and pollution exposure in Tabriz. The findings reveal a dual burden of ecological deprivation and environmental risk in specific neighborhoods, emphasizing the need for data-driven, equity-oriented urban planning. Policymakers should prioritize interventions in LH zones, where residents face the greatest environmental and health challenges. By integrating satellite data, spatial analysis, and inequality assessment, the research offers a replicable model for diagnosing urban environmental injustice. Future studies should expand this framework to include other pollutants, socio-economic indicators, and longitudinal data to capture temporal dynamics of urban inequality. Ultimately, achieving spatial justice requires not only technical precision but also a commitment to inclusive and sustainable urban governance.
 
Funding
There is no funding support.
 
 
Authors’ Contribution
Authors contributed equally to the conceptualization and writing of the article. All of the authors approved thecontent of the manuscript and agreed on all aspects of the work declaration of competing interest none.
 
Conflict of Interest
Authors declared no conflict of interest.
 
Acknowledgments
We are grateful to all the scientific consultants of this paper.

Keywords


  1. Badamchizadeh, P., Saadatjoo, P., Ahmadlouydarab, M., & Kazemian, M. (2023). Greenery as a Mitigation Strategy for Pedestrian Level Wind Condition in Urban Areas; Case Study: Imam Street in Tabriz. Naqshejahan- Basic studies and New Technologies of Architecture and Planning, 12(4), 96-115 https://dorl.net/dor/20.1001.1.23224991.1401.12.4.4.0
  2. Baučić, M., Tomić, M., & Hribar, M. (2020). GIS-based evaluation of urban green space distribution and accessibility in Ljubljana. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information, 9(7), 407. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi9070407
  3. Breed, C. A., Engemann, K., & Pasgaard, M. (2024). A transdisciplinary multiscaled approach to engage with green infrastructure planning, restoration and use in sub-Saharan Africa. Urban Ecosystems, )27(, 895–907.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11252-023-01477-y
  4. Cao, X., Luo, Y., Chen, X., Xie, Q., & Yao, Z. (2024). Spatial valuation of urban green lungs: Unveiling the true worth of urban parks through MGWR in Chengdu, China. Land Use Policy, 145, 107294. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2024.107294
  5. Fainstein, S. S. (2010). The Just City. Cornell University Press
  6. Fang, D., Liu, D., & Kwan, M.-P. (2025). Evaluating spatial variation of accessibility to urban green spaces and its inequity in Chicago: Perspectives from multi-types of travel modes and travel time. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 104, 128-593. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2024.128593
  7. Fraser, N. (2008). Scales of Justice: Reimagining Political Space in a Globalizing World. Columbia University Press.
  8. Ghanbari, A., Oskouee Aras, A. and Badamchizadeh, P. (2024). Assessing the Status of Tabriz Metropolis According to the Indicators of an Elderly-Friendly City in Formal and Informal Settlements (Case study: Regions 2, 8 and 10). Journal of Economic & Developmental Sociology13(1), 195-230. doi: 10.22034/jeds.2024.60738.1798 [In Persian].
  9. Ghasemi, K., Behzadfar, M., Borhani, K., & Nouri, Z. (2022). Geographic information system based combined compromise solution (CoCoSo) method for exploring the spatial justice of accessing urban green spaces: A comparative study of district 22 of Tehran. Ecological Indicators, 144, 109455. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2022.109455
  10. Grinspan, J., Rahman, S., & Lee, K. (2020). Green for Whom? Environmental justice implications of urban park investments. Environmental Justice, 13(2), 55–64.
  11. Harvey, D. (2009). Social Justice and the City (Revised ed.). University of Georgia Press. (Original work published 1973)
  12. Hatami Nejad, H., Khademi, A. H., & Zargham Fard, M. (2015). Spatial distribution analysis of urban parks in Amol with a social justice approach. Journal of Urban Structure and Function Studies, (10), 29–53. [In Persian].
  13. He, S., Wu, Y., & Wang, L. (2020). Characterizing Horizontal and Vertical Perspectives of Spatial Equity for Various Urban Green Spaces: A Case Study of Wuhan, China. Frontiers in Public Health, (8), 10. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2020.00010
  14. Jalkanen, J., Vierikko, K., Kujala, H., Kivistö, I., Kohonen, I., Lehtinen, P., Toivonen, T., Virtanen, E., & Moilanen, A. (2025). Identifying priority urban green areas for biodiversity conservation and equitable recreational accessibility using spatial prioritization. Landscape and Urban Planning, 259, 105356. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2025.105356
  15. Jennings, V., & Johnson Gaither, C. (2020). Urban green space equity and mental health. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(3), 880.
  16. Li, M., Wang, C., Wu, Y., Santamouris, M., & Lu, S. (2025). Assessing spatial inequities of thermal environment and blue-green intervention for vulnerable populations in dense urban areas. Urban Climate, 59, 102328. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.uclim.2025.102328
  17. Liu, R., Pan, X., Xia, Z., Gou, J., Han, J., Cao, K., Wang, D., & Xue, C. (2025). How to lead the optimization of parks spatial patterns more comprehensively with the philosophy of green equity: A case of Chengdu. Habitat International, 157, 103318. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2025.103318
  18. Lu, Y., Chen, R., Chen, B., & Wu, J. (2024). Inclusive green environment for all? An investigation of spatial access equity of urban green space and associated socioeconomic drivers in China. Landscape and Urban Planning, 241, 104926. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2023.104926
  19. Oskouee Aras, A. & Hakimi, H. (2021). Measuring Indicators of Urban Vitality in Informal Settlements (Case study: Seilab Qoshkhane Tabriz). Geographical Urban Planning Research (GUPR), 9(1), 143-163. doi: 10.22059/jurbangeo.2021.309948.1363 [In Persian].
  20. Rasouli, N., Ilanloo, M., & Nekouei Esfahani, A. (2024). Spatial evaluation and planning of public green spaces using GIS (Case study: District 10 of Tehran). New Attitudes in Human Geography Quarterly, 16(3), 64–88. https://doi.org/10.71651/GEOGRAPHY.2024.0041821 [In Persian].
  21. Rui, J. (2025). Green disparities, happiness elusive: Decoding the spatial mismatch between green equity and the happiness from vulnerable perspectives. Cities, 163, 106063. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2025.106063
  22. Sharifzadeh Aghdam, E., & Ghodsi, S. J. (2022). Evaluation of urban green space distribution using spatial justice approach in Zanjan city. Journal of Geographical Sciences, (35), 148–170. [In Persian].
  23. Soja, E. W. (2010). Seeking Spatial Justice. University of Minnesota Press
  24. Szczepańska, M., Szczepański, M., & Kacprzak, A. (2022). Climate Change Mitigation and Preservation of the Cultural Heritage—A Story of the Municipal Park in Rumia, Poland. Land, 11(1), 65. https://doi.org/10.3390/land11010065
  25. Tahmasebi moghaddam, H., zanganeh, M., Heydari, M. and Imani, M. (2022). Explaining the Spatial Distribution Pattern of Urban Inner Parks With Spatial Justice Approach, Study Area: Sabzevar City. Journal of Urban Ecology Researches, 12(25), 19-36. doi: 10.30473/grup.2022.8664 [In Persian].
  26.  UN-Habitat. (2025). Guidelines for equitable urban greening. United Nations Human Settlements Programme.
  27. WHO. (2020). Urban green spaces and health: A review of evidence and effectiveness. World Health Organization Regional Office for Europe.
  28. Yang, M., Ye, P., & He, J. (2025). Green and blue infrastructure for urban cooling: Multi-scale mechanisms, spatial optimization, and methodological integration. Sustainable Cities and Society, 129, 106501. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2025.106501
  29. Yazar, M., & York, A. (2023). Nature-based solutions through collective actions for spatial justice in urban green commons. Environmental Science & Policy, 145, 228–237. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2023.04.016
  30. Ziari, K., & Zebardast, K. (2024). Spatial distribution and equity of urban green space provision in Tehran Metropolis using hybrid Factor Analysis and Analytic Network Process (F′ANP) model. Geomatica, 76(2), 100022. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomat.2024.100022