تحلیل سطوح برخورداری مناطق روستایی از عوامل محیطی مؤثر بر توسعه مؤلفه‌های کارآفرینانه کشاورزی مطالعه موردی: بخش ساردوئیه شهرستان جیرفت

نوع مقاله : علمی - پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 گروه جغرافیای انسانی و آمایش، دانشگاه شهید بهشتی، تهران، ایران

2 گروه جغرافیا و برنامه‌ریزی روستایی، دانشگاه فردوسی مشهد، مشهد، ایران

چکیده

کارآفرینی روستایی عبارت است از ایجاد فعالیتی جدید که تولیدی تازه یا خدماتی جدید را معرفی کند و یا بازار جدیدی را به وجود آورد و از تکنولوژی جدید در محیط روستایی استفاده کند. اهمیت واژه کارآفرینی و عوامل محیطی تأثیرگذار بر آن به حدی است که طی دو دهـه اخیـر، تبـدیل بـه یـک موضـوع بسیار مهم نزد اندیشمندان و محققین شده است به‌طوری‌که برخی این دوره را عصر کارآفرینی نام‌گذاری کرده‌اند. هدف پژوهش حاضر، تحلیل سطوح برخورداری مناطق روستایی از عوامل محیطی مؤثر بر توسعه مؤلفه‌های کارآفرینانه کشاورزی است. روش‌شناسی پژوهش از جهت هدف کاربردی است. منطقه موردمطالعه در این تحقیق ساکنان روستاهای بالای 50 خانوار در بخش ساردوئیه و واحد تحقیق صاحبان کسب‌وکار و نوآوران موفق بخش کشاورزی می‌باشند ملاک انتخاب جامعه نمونه، افرادی بود که با چالش‌های توسعه کارآفرینی درگیر بوده که از این تعداد 50 نفر به‌عنوان نمونه آماری و به‌صورت تصادفی انتخاب شدند و پرسشنامه در بین آن‌ها توزیع گردید. نتایج به‌دست‌آمده با استفاده از مدل‌های تاپسیس خاکستری و تاپسیس فازی ترکیب این دو مدل در تکنیک ادغام نشان داد؛ دهستان‌های موردمطالعه در سطوح مختلفی از لحاظ اولویت‌بندی عوامل محیطی اثرگذار بر توسعه مؤلفه‌های کارآفرینی قرارگرفته‌اند که دراین‌بین، دهستان کهنوج سادات (16/1) و دره رود (5/2) در سطوح بالای برخورداری و دهستان‌های گریکان (5/9) و دولت‌آباد (66/8) از پایین‌ترین سطح برخوردارند.  

کلیدواژه‌ها


عنوان مقاله [English]

Identifying and Prioritizing the Environmental Factors Affecting the Development of Entrepreneurial Components among Rural Farmers: the Case study of Sardouyeh District, Jiroft County

نویسندگان [English]

  • Ali Akbar Anabestani 1
  • Seyed Reza Hosieni Kahnoj 2
1 Department of Human Geography & Spatial Planning, Shahid Beheshti University, Tehran, Iran
2 Department of Geography & Rural Planning, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Mashhad, Iran
چکیده [English]

A B S T R A C T
Rural entrepreneurship means creating a new activity that introduces a new product or service or creates a new market and uses new technology in the rural environment. The importance of the term entrepreneurship and the environmental factors affecting it is so much that during the last two decades, it has become a very important topic for thinkers and researchers, so some have named this period the age of entrepreneurship. The present research aims to analyze the levels of rural areas' enjoyment of environmental factors affecting the development of agricultural entrepreneurial components. The research methodology is practical in terms of purpose. The area under study in this research is the residents of villages with more than 50 households in Sardoiyeh. The research unit is business owners and successful innovators in the agricultural sector. Were selected and the questionnaire was distributed among them. The results obtained using grey TOPSIS and fuzzy TOPSIS models showed the combination of these two models in the integration technique; The studied villages are at different levels in terms of prioritization of environmental factors affecting the development of entrepreneurship components, among which, Kohnouj Sadat village (1.16) and Dareh Rood village (2.5) are at high levels of prosperity and Grikan village (9.5) and Daulatabad village (5.5) 8/66) have the lowest level.
Extended Abstract
Introduction
Each of the above-mentioned studies has presented its own view and theoretical framework toward effective environmental factors; sometimes some factors have been considered as superior and they have been merely studied from one dimension regardless the internal and external barriers. As it was mentioned before, various factors contribute, and in the present study we have tried to investigate the effective environmental factors in rural district of Sardouyeh in the Jiroft County, regarding the fact that this city as one of the agricultural poles having necessary potentials, can be able to provide the ground for entrepreneurship. Actually, the biggest challenge in this regard is recognizing the factors making an entrepreneurship successful. Therefore, the present study is going to evaluate the effectiveness coefficient of environmental factors on entrepreneurial traits.
 
Methodology
The methodology of the present study is descriptive-analytic and applied with regard to the purpose. The study case of this research includes the inhabitants of the villages with more than 50 households located in Sardouyeh rural district in the Jiroft County; the research units are business owners and successful innovators in agriculture, among whom 50 people were selected randomly as the sample, and the questionnaires were distributed among them. In the present study efforts have been made to investigate the external (environmental) factors and present solutions for developing entrepreneurship. It requires collecting and categorizing the environmental factors and components affecting the development of entrepreneurship which has been achieved by literature review. In the first phase of collecting data and information, we used library review (using books and articles) in the second phase of data collecting, we tried to gain the opinions of entrepreneurs in agriculture toward the environmental factors by designing appropriate questions. In order to calculate the validity of the questionnaire face validity method was used. Once the validity of questionnaire was confirmed by people with experience in entrepreneurship, data was collected from the sample.  
 
Results and discussion
It is possible that the rural areas get different rankings in different techniques. Such that according to fuzzy TOPSIS model, an area gets ranking 1, and gets ranking 3 in VIKOR method. In this case to eliminate the differences and for a consensus in rankings we can use a merging method like ranking averages, vector method, or Copeland method. In this stage we should come to consensus according three prioritizing strategies. Then the rankings of the relevant indices are obtained by the three methods, then the results of three methods are merged and the average is calculated for each area. Finally, the areas are ranked based on the results of the merging method and the final rank is obtained. According of research finding, the villages in Sardouyeh rural district are at different levels, among which Kahnouj Sadat (1.16), and Dareh Roud (2.5) are at the highest level; and Pol-Piran (7.66), Dowlat Abad (8.66), and Garikan (9.5) are the most deprived areas.
 
Conclusion
In the present study, we prioritized the villages in Sardouyeh rural district with regard to environmental indices affecting entrepreneurship development. For this purpose, we used 4 main indices, 8 sub-indices, and 31 items which were studied by distributing questionnaires with Likert scale among 50 people in this district. The results obtained from fuzzy TOPSIS model indicates well that all the villages are at levels lower than appropriate level. With regard to effective environmental factors, Kahnouj Sadat with the score of 0.338 is at the first place, Dahane Zourak with the score of 0.322 is in the second place; and Seyf Abad and Garikan are in the last places. In grey calculations, like fuzzy TOPSIS model, the closer the dedicated value to 1, its spatial distribution is more favorable. With regard to environmental factors affecting people’s cognition, Nahr Kamal with the score of 0.680, is in the first place and Kahnouj Sadat with the score of 0.664 is in the second place; while Pol-Piran and Dahaneh-Zourak is in the last place. In this regard in order to promote entrepreneurship capacities and achieve sustainable development, the following suggestions are presented:

Capacitating and preparing appropriate grounds for entrepreneurship in rural areas.
Identifying strengths and weaknesses of the villages to exploit the rural areas optimally and appropriately.
Making the rural environment interesting by purposeful development of spaces and operations in the villages.
Creating centers for accessing experienced entrepreneurs.

 
Funding
There is no funding support.
 
Authors’ Contribution
Authors contributed equally to the conceptualization and writing of the article. All of the authors approved thecontent of the manuscript and agreed on all aspects of the work declaration of competing interest none.
 
Conflict of Interest
Authors declared no conflict of interest.
 
Acknowledgments
We are grateful to all the scientific consultants of this paper.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Environmental Factors
  • Rural Entrepreneurship
  • Grey Relation Analysis
  • Merging Technique
  1. احمدی، فریدون؛ شافعی، رضا و مفاخری نیا، فرانک. (1391). بررسی تأثیر عوامل فردی و محیطی بر رفتار کارآفرینانه دانشجویان دانشگاه کردستان. توسعه کارآفرینی، 4 (15)، 145-163
  2. ایمانی، عبدالمجید؛ سالارزهی، حبیب‌الله و سیدی، فرزانه. (1395). شناسایی و اولویت‌بندی عوامل مؤثر بر نهادینه‌سازی ابعاد اجرایی کارآفرینی سازمانی (مطالعه شرکت کرمان موتور خودروسازی شهرستان بم). فصلنامه پژوهش‌های مدیریت عمومی، 9 (31)، 144-123.
  3. پزشکی، محسن؛ فتاحی، مجید؛ احمدی، مسعود و موسی پور، محمدعلی. (1396)، رتبه‌بندی عوامل مؤثر بر توسعه کارآفرینی در منطقه ویژه اقتصادی بندر امیرآباد. مجله صنعت حمل‌ونقل دریایی، 3(2)، 23-14.
  4. حیدری مکرر، حمید و محبی، زهرا. (1391). بررسی عوامل مؤثر بر توسعه کارآفرینی در مناطق روستایی. کنفرانس ملی کارآفرینی و مدیریت کسب‌وکارهای دانش‌بنیان، دانشگاه مازندران، صص 19-1.
  5. رازقندی، ناهید و درانی، ناهید. (1388). شناسایی عوامل فردی و محیطی مؤثر بر موفقیت کارآفرینان برتر استان تهران جهت ارائه الگوی آموزشی. توسعه کارآفرینی، 2 (6)، 55-39.
  6. رکن‌الدین افتخاری، عبدالرضا؛ پورطاهری، مهدی؛ فرج زاده، منوچهر و حیدری ساربان، وکیل. (1388). نقش توانمندسازی در توسعه کشاورزی (مطالعه موردی: استان اردبیل). پژوهش‌های جغرافیای انسانی، 69، 103-87.
  7. شهبازی منشادی، مهرداد و سالارزهی، حبیب‌الله. (1395). شناسایی و اولویت‌بندی عوامل استراتژیک مؤثر بر کسب‌وکارهای کوچک و متوسط با استفاده از رویکرد تحلیل سلسله مراتبی (مطالعه‌ای در صنعت کاشی و سرامیک). نشریه توسعه کارآفرینی، 9 (1)، 139-119.
  8. طوسی، رمضان؛ جمشیدی، علیرضا و تقدیسی، احمد. (1393). کارآفرینی روستایی و تعیین عوامل مؤثر بر آن (مطالعه موردی: روستاهای شهرستان مینودشت). مجلّه پژوهش و برنامه‌ریزی روستایی، 3 (8)، 12-1.
  9. عطایی، محمد. (1389). تصمیم‌گیری چندمعیاره فازی. چاپ اول، شاهرود: انتشارات دانشگاه صنعتی شاهرود.
  10. فرجی سبکبار، حسنعلی. (1390)، اولویت‌بندی توسعه کارآفرینی در مناطق روستایی با استفاده از تکنیک پرومتی مطالعه موردی: دهستان حومه بخش مرکزی شهرستان خدابنده استان زنجان. پژوهش‌های جغرافیای انسانی، 75، 68-58.
  11. قوامی، هادی و لطفعلی پور، محمدرضا. (1387)، بررسی عوامل مؤثر بر انتخاب کارآفرینی در مقایسه با اشتغال دستمزدی دانش آموختان: مطالعه موردی دانشگاه فردوسی مشهد. مجله دانش و توسعه، 15 (24)، 163-182.
  12. کریمی، سعید؛ بیمنز، هارم؛ چیذری، محمد و مولدر، مارتین. (1390). بررسی تأثیر عوامل محیطی و فرهنگی بر قصد کارآفرینانه دانشجویان کشاورزی. توسعه کارآفرینی، 5 (3)، 124-105.
  13. محمدی یگانه، بهروز. (1392). توسعه کارآفرینی و نقش آن در هزینه اعتبارات فردی و گروهی کشاورزی. استان زنجان. فصلنامه اقتصاد فضا و توسعه روستایی، 2 (6)، 57-43.
  14. مطیعی لنگرودی، سید حسن؛ قدیری معصوم؛ مجتبی، دادورخانی، فضیله؛ یداللهی فارسی، جهانگیر و ترکاشوند، زهرا. (1391). تبیین عوامل مؤثر بر توانمندسازی روستاییان در توسعه کارآفرینی (مطالعه موردی: بخش‌های زند و سامن شهرستان ملایر). مجله پژوهش‌های جغرافیای انسانی، 80، 138-119.
  15. نجفی کانی، علی‌اکبر؛ حسام، مهدی و آشور، حدیثه. (1394). سنجش وضعیت توسعه کارآفرینی در مناطق روستایی مورد: دهستان استرآباد جنوبی در شهرستان گرگان. فصلنامه اقتصاد فضا و توسعه روستایی، 4 (1)، 56-37.
  16. یداللهی فارسی، جهانگیر و رضوی، سید حسن. (1391). نقش سرمایه اجتماعی و سرمایه انسانی در کارآفرینی جوانان روستاهای بخش کربال. پژوهش‌های جغرافیای انسانی، 79، 115-103.
  17. Ahmadi, F., Shafi'i, R., & Mofakheri Nia, F. (2011). Investigating the influence of individual and environmental factors on the entrepreneurial behavior of Kurdistan University students. Entrepreneurship Development, 4(15), 145-163. [in Persian].
  18. Atai, M. (2010). Fuzzy multi-criteria decision making. First edition, Shahrood: Press of Shahrood University of Technology. [in Persian].
  19. Bruno, A. V., Tyebjee, T.T. (1982). The environment for entrepreneurship. In Kent, c., Sexton, D., Vesper, K. (Eds) the Encyclopedial of Entreoreneurship. Englewood cliffs, NJ
  20. Dahlstrand, Å. (2007). Technology-based entrepreneurship and regional development: the case of Sweden. European Business Review19(5), 373-386.
  21. Elijah Esema, I., & Stefanovic, S. (2014). Professional Education and Youth Empowerment through Entrepreneurship for Socio-Economic Development in Nigeria. International Conferees, Employment, Education and Entrepreneurship, 15-17 October 2014 Belgrade Serbia.
  22. Faraji Sobkbar, H. A. (2017), prioritizing the development of entrepreneurship in rural areas using the PROM technique, a case study: the suburbs of the central part of Khodabande County, Zanjan Province. Human Geography Research, 75, 58-68. [in Persian].
  23. Fayolle, A., & Gailly, B. (2008). From craft to science: Teaching models and learning processes in entrepreneurship education. Journal of European Industrial Training32(7), 569-593.
  24. Franke, N., & Lüthje, C. (2004). Entrepreneurial intentions of business students—A benchmarking study. International Journal of Innovation and Technology Management1(03), 269-288.
  25. Heaton, J. (2005). Developing Entrepreneurs: An Examination of Systematic Approaches to Entrepreneurial Development for Rural Areas. Illinois Institute for Rural Affairs, Rural Research Report, Macomb.
  26. Heydari Kamar, H., & Mohebi, Z. (2011). Investigating factors affecting the development of entrepreneurship in rural areas. National Conference on Entrepreneurship and Management of Knowledge-Based Businesses, Mazandaran University, pp. 1-19. [in Persian].
  27. Imani, A. M., Salarzahi, H., & Seidi, F. (2015). Identifying and prioritizing effective factors on the institutionalization of executive dimensions of organizational entrepreneurship (study of Kerman Motor Khodrosazi Company, Bam city). Public Management Research Quarterly, 9 (31), 123-144. [in Persian].
  28. Ismail, M., Khalid, S. A., Othman, M., Jusoff, H. K., Rahman, N. A., Kassim, K. M., & Zain, R. S. (2009). Entrepreneurial intention among Malaysian undergraduates. International Journal of Business and Management4(10), 54.
  29. Jack, S. L., & Anderson, A. R. (1999). Entrepreneurship education within the enterprise culture: producing reflective practitioners. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research5(3), 110-125.
  30. Karimi, S., Beamans, H., Chizari, M., & Mulder, M. (2011). Investigating the effect of environmental and cultural factors on the entrepreneurial intention of agricultural students. Entrepreneurship Development, 5(3), 124-105. [in Persian].
  31. Matiei Langroudi, S. H., Qadiri, M., Dadurkhani, F., Yadollahi Farsi, J., & Turkashund, Z. (2011). Explaining the effective factors on the empowerment of villagers in the development of entrepreneurship (case study: Zand and Samen sections of Malair city). Journal of Human Geography Research, 80, 119-138. [in Persian].
  32. Medicine, M., Fatahi, M., Ahmadi, M., & Musapour, M. A. (2016), ranking of factors affecting the development of entrepreneurship in the special economic zone of Amirabad port. Journal of the Maritime Industry, 3(2), 14-23. [in Persian].
  33. Mohammadi Yeganeh, B. (2012). Development of entrepreneurship and its role in the cost of individual and group agricultural credits. Zanjan province. Journal of Spatial Economics and Rural Development, 2(6), 43-57. [in Persian].
  34. Najafi Kani, A. A., Hossam, M., & Ashur, H. (2014). Assessing the state of entrepreneurship development in rural areas, case: Southern Estrabad village in Gorgan city. Journal of Spatial Economics and Rural Development, 4(1), 56-37. [in Persian].
  35. Oser, F., & Volery, T. (2012). " Sense of Failure" and" sense of Success" Among Entrepreneurs: the Identification and Promotion of Neglected Twin Entrepreneurial Competencies. SKBF.
  36. Qavami, H., & Lotfalipour, M. R. (2007), Investigating the factors affecting the choice of entrepreneurship compared to the paid employment of graduates: a case study of Ferdowsi University of Mashhad. Journal of Knowledge and Development, 15(24), 163-182. [in Persian].
  37. Razgundi, N., & Durrani, N. (2009). Identifying individual and environmental factors affecting the success of top entrepreneurs in Tehran province in order to provide an educational model. Entrepreneurship Development, 2(6), 55-39. [in Persian].
  38. Ruknuddin Eftekhari, A. R., Portahari, M., Farajzadeh, M., & Heydari Sarban, V. (2008). the role of empowerment in agricultural development (case study: Ardabil province). Human Geography Research, 69, 103-87. [in Persian].
  39. Shahbazi Manshadi, M., & Salarzahi, H. (2015). Identifying and prioritizing strategic factors affecting small and medium businesses using a hierarchical analysis approach (a study in the tile and ceramic industry). Journal of Entrepreneurship Development, 9(1), 119-139. [in Persian].
  40. Shane, S., & Venkataraman, S. (2000). The promise of entrepreneurship as a field of research. Academy of management review25(1), 217-226.
  41. Turker, D., & Sonmez Selçuk, S. (2009). Which factors affect entrepreneurial intention of university students?. Journal of European industrial training33(2), 142-159.
  42. Tusi, R., Jamshidi, A., & Tagdisi, A. (2013). Rural entrepreneurship and determination of factors affecting it (case study: villages of Minodasht city). Journal of Rural Planning and Research, 3 (8), 1-12. [in Persian].
  43. Yadollahi Farsi, J., & Razavi, S. H. (2011). The role of social capital and human capital in the entrepreneurship of young people in the villages of Karbal district. Human Geography Research, 79, 103-115. [in Persian].